Donate SIGN UP

The Return Of The God Hypothesis.

Avatar Image
Theland | 15:51 Fri 12th Jun 2020 | Religion & Spirituality
181 Answers
If science puts up barriers and refuses to follow truth wherever it leads, then it is left floundering for answers to the big questions, on the creation of the universe, the creation of life from inert chemicals, and the impossibility of Darwin's theory of a sing!e cell ancestor.
Do you consider yourself open minded about such matters and not constricted by a naturalistic worldview?
https://youtu.be/y02a28FrMKs
Gravatar

Answers

101 to 120 of 181rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Avatar Image
Theland - // Andy, for somebody who has no interest and nothing to say, you say an awful lot. // I never said I had no interest, I said I didn't care in looking for 'answers' which is not the same thing. Nothing to say? Are you serious???????
20:16 Fri 12th Jun 2020
Question Author
Naomi, your post does not even warrant a reply.
Theland, There’s nothing you can say.
Question Author
Naomi, there is plenty I could say, but it is wasted on you.
Sorry - off topic - but are you feeling any better Theland. ?Haven't read the whole thread so you may have been asked before.
Question Author
Slightly better thanks Rosie.
Am taking antibiotics and morphine in addition to a host of my usual meds, so rather depressing.
But many thanks for your concern.. X
Theland, you can talk all you like but your claim cannot be justified - or rationalised.
Question Author
Naomi, I cannot talk all I like, because as usual, you will insist upon, and get, the last word.
It is your trademark.
(Or am I alone thinking this?)
You're certainly not alone in employing that puerile fabricated nonsense, Theland, but it's the mark of a defeated argument.
'First (uncaused) cause', last digit of pi, even in binary I doubt I have a 50-50 chance of guessing right. I can't relate, have nothing in my experience to associate that with. Old dogs . . . new tricks. Must be time for another hit of windowpane -

Question Author
Thanks Mibs.

Naomi, as usual, your comment requires you to demand a victory in the discussion.
A hollow victory, because apart from your own very loud opinions, self promoting as usual, you have not referred to any source from academia to back you up, or to shut me down.
Just yapping does not mame you right, even if you post on full volume.
You often say you are interested in religions, but your interests will never teach you anything, if you begin, and remain, in the same old boring mindset.
You have exposed yourself as a complete amateur and certainly no academic.
But you continue to look in the mirror and worship your own image.
There's plenty on here who have you weighed up correctly.
Theland, I feel I have to point out … last week you were complaining about the 'derisory' comments you received on your threads - and now you're doing the very same thing yourself! Surely fairness and respect work both ways?
Haha! Kicking me on a personal level again might make you feel better, Theland - even claiming safety in numbers might give you a bit of confidence - but neither improves your argument. :o)
Question Author
Never - Actually never. I speak truth. It hurts. (Apparently!)
Question Author
My argument cannot be improved.
I have cited prominent PHD's many times, can't get better.
You have only submitted your own opinion.
Never what?
Question Author
Never - If you want an example of a well mannered exchange of views, read the discussion between Mibs and myself.
Neither of us have refrained from vigorous discussion, bit respectfully.
Anything wrong with that?
//Neither of us have refrained from vigorous discussion, bit respectfully. //

You've certainly - yet again - refrained from respectful discussion and it's been pointed out to you.
Theland, I have seen those threads, not a problem. I've also seen your cranky, derisory remarks today - those surprised me after you saying such things were 'depressing'.
PS Of course your argument could be improved. The PhDs you've cited (again and again) are the four or five who're saying what you want to hear.
Question Author
Four or five? No many more.
Where are the PhDs to shoot me down?
Any names?
Question Author
The PhDs I cited were atheists!

101 to 120 of 181rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The Return Of The God Hypothesis.

Answer Question >>