So Digs is a cheat then...

[Blue-Bird]

Why do people with money think they will get away with it...!?

[Blue-Bird]

Digs**

[carmalee]

think they subscibe to the belief of 'one rule for the rich and one rule for the poor' -

[Canary42]

Because before Twitter they nearly always did.

[Blue-Bird]

They are going to get caught as they are constantly in the lime light!!!

[woofgang]

I do wonder if this injunction thing is getting to be kind of a fashion statement?

[Blue-Bird]

Probably! Feel sorry for Imogen, she is the one having to take all the flack off the press and sleazy comments off people. It takes two tango!!

[carmalee]

what, a bit like an ASBO - badge of honour? Sort of vindication that you've made it

[chelle7272]

It was all over the internet before I the twitter thing.

they also get away it with it because other peiople with power and money will protect them. Should i now say think they will get away with it.

if I was his wife I don't know if I'd be more hurt about the affair or the extremes he went to to try and cover it up.

[milly143]

I don't feel sorry for her. What do you think is going to happen when you sleep with a married man who happens to be a household name. Although I agree it takes two to tango, she hardly has a history of being a shrinking violet has she.

[chelle7272]

hear hear milly!

[daftgrandad]

He follows the SAF and Man Utd laws.
We can do no wrong.We are above the laws of football and the UK.

[jackthehat]

Is there a law against adultery of which I am unaware............?

[Blue-Bird]

I didn't mean that she didn't do no wrong, of course she did because she knew he was married, just the fact that she has to take all the rubbish on her own and he didn't get any...

[daftgrandad]

Is that a little dig at me jth ?
Perhaps I should have said rule,would that be ok ?

[jackthehat]

There's a rule against adultery, too ?

Crikey, I must pay more attention........

[milly143]

I wouldn't worry. People have known who he was long before it was said on Twitter and he will get his fair share.

Jack - there should be.

[Blue-Bird]

I agree, there defo should be a law against adultery!!

[daftgrandad]

You seem to be trying to make a point jth.
Could I be so bold as to ask exactly what it is ?

[Sqad]

daftgrandad ;-)

[albaqwerty]

maybe, just maybe the SI was to protect a vulnerable person/people who MIGHT have been pyschologically (sp) tipped over the edge if they had read it in the papers.

I do not agree that if he had money and went elsewhere for a bit of fun then that should result in any sort of injunction.