Andy > Hopefully he now understands the difference, and has added that to the long list of things on which he requires education.
Yes, he cannot undo what he has said but he has apologised.
I haven't seen the full interview he gave this morning but I did hear the outraged women. Bristow, having given an apology, was still challenged by her stating that if he really meant it he would give to her charity. Why should he? He has had the decency to give an interview, apologised and that should be the end of it.
Why do some people apply their own sliding scales of levels of sincerity when apologies are issued as if to continue the situation?
I though the woman's comment of 'blood on his hands' was petulant, disproportionate and, in itself, worthy of an apology.