Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Should Usain Bolt Have To Give His Gold Medal Back?
Why not just punish the offender and not the whole team?
http:// m.bbc.c o.uk/sp ort/ath letics/ 3874484 6
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by vortex. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.sorry, douglas, lost track of the argument a bit, but I said peer pressure should be put on members of the team, by the members of the team. It didn't happen this time, but maybe next time they'll think twice before risking everyone's medals. It's only a shame it's taken so long, but I don't know why that's the case.
Baldric, I realise you haven't read all of the thread but I am asking folk to consider whether, realistically, the result was affected by one athlete's offence?
The answer is categorically 'no'. The team won by a good 10 metres. Nesta went on the opening leg. By the third leg (Bolt) the lead was commanding and was extended by the final runner.
The answer is categorically 'no'. The team won by a good 10 metres. Nesta went on the opening leg. By the third leg (Bolt) the lead was commanding and was extended by the final runner.
//I am asking folk to consider whether, realistically, the result was affected by one athlete's offence? //
So we are saying that a team won and one of them was cheating, but let the rest of the team keep their medals as they would have won even if the guy wasn't cheating. That seems a dangerous precedent to set to me. I mean how do you know they would have won; the cheater might have been panicking at his slow time and misjudged his baton handover.
So we are saying that a team won and one of them was cheating, but let the rest of the team keep their medals as they would have won even if the guy wasn't cheating. That seems a dangerous precedent to set to me. I mean how do you know they would have won; the cheater might have been panicking at his slow time and misjudged his baton handover.
jno - if it's an infringement that is known before the race , then certainly that person/team would not be made to take part.
However , in this case the infringement only came to light years later so a decision has to be made retrospectively , long after the event
What i think vortex is arguing ( which is one opinion ) , is that , in this case , it did not have a determining effect on the final result - so punish the individual and not the other members of the team .
However , in this case the infringement only came to light years later so a decision has to be made retrospectively , long after the event
What i think vortex is arguing ( which is one opinion ) , is that , in this case , it did not have a determining effect on the final result - so punish the individual and not the other members of the team .
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.