Crosswords2 mins ago
Will Blair Ever Be Bought To Justice?
I was reading the archives and remembered this fellow.
Where are with dragging him to The Hague and throwing the war crime book at him?
https:/
Where are with dragging him to The Hague and throwing the war crime book at him?
https:/
Answers
He assessed the situation on the best evidence available, coupled with the past history of Saddam Hussein and made a decision. Nothing wrong there.
18:02 Sun 22nd Jul 2018
http://
https:/
\\In January of 2010, Lord Hutton ordered that all files relating to Dr Kelly's post-mortem – including the autopsy report, unpublished medical and scientific records and photographs of the body – should remain secret for 70 years. The judge suggested that his intention was to avoid further distress to the family. But the move fuelled the conviction of sceptics that something was being hidden.//
Why keep it secret for 70 years.
https:/
\\In January of 2010, Lord Hutton ordered that all files relating to Dr Kelly's post-mortem – including the autopsy report, unpublished medical and scientific records and photographs of the body – should remain secret for 70 years. The judge suggested that his intention was to avoid further distress to the family. But the move fuelled the conviction of sceptics that something was being hidden.//
Why keep it secret for 70 years.
//Answer
If he is sorry then why does he not tear his clothes and cover himself in ashes and donate his millions to the bereaved families of the soldiers who died and the soldiers injured.//
And let’s not forget about the thousands of innocent Iraqis who died and the destruction and damage we did to their country as well as destroying their infrastructure.
If he is sorry then why does he not tear his clothes and cover himself in ashes and donate his millions to the bereaved families of the soldiers who died and the soldiers injured.//
And let’s not forget about the thousands of innocent Iraqis who died and the destruction and damage we did to their country as well as destroying their infrastructure.
of course they are....
the mistake Blair and Bush made was not to do a Bosnian after the Brits went into Basra and discovered a grave of over 5000 dead...if that ain't genocide, what is.
Then there was the fishermen of the Gulf and how Saddam was mustard-gassing them, a Beeb documentary on that.
They missed their political opportunities as they sought the more dramatic WMD - and yet they could have taken a lot of credit for nailing the barrstard on genocide.
the mistake Blair and Bush made was not to do a Bosnian after the Brits went into Basra and discovered a grave of over 5000 dead...if that ain't genocide, what is.
Then there was the fishermen of the Gulf and how Saddam was mustard-gassing them, a Beeb documentary on that.
They missed their political opportunities as they sought the more dramatic WMD - and yet they could have taken a lot of credit for nailing the barrstard on genocide.
//British arms deals with the Saudis over the last couple of years have been worth nearly £5 billion//
What does Israel think about that?
Why is the government screaming, pointing and telling us these are terrorists with one hand whilst sneakily doing shady underhand deals with the other?
Who exactly is sanctioning these deals? I as a tax payer certainly did not and we, the people of this country did not.
What does Israel think about that?
Why is the government screaming, pointing and telling us these are terrorists with one hand whilst sneakily doing shady underhand deals with the other?
Who exactly is sanctioning these deals? I as a tax payer certainly did not and we, the people of this country did not.
//Who exactly is sanctioning these deals? I as a tax payer certainly did not and we, the people of this country did not. //
as a taxpayer, it would be impractical if you (and me, and everyone else) had to be consulted on every aspect of UK policy - I mean, look how much controversy has been created by just one such vote last year.
in the main, we elect a member of parliament to represent our interests. if you want to do all you can to ensure that your MP doesn't sanction dodgy arms deals, you need to question all of the candidates as to whether they really do represent your views. willing to be that very few voters actually bother; you may not have sanctioned the deals, but if you didn't try and elect the right MP, you could be said to have caused it to happen.
as a taxpayer, it would be impractical if you (and me, and everyone else) had to be consulted on every aspect of UK policy - I mean, look how much controversy has been created by just one such vote last year.
in the main, we elect a member of parliament to represent our interests. if you want to do all you can to ensure that your MP doesn't sanction dodgy arms deals, you need to question all of the candidates as to whether they really do represent your views. willing to be that very few voters actually bother; you may not have sanctioned the deals, but if you didn't try and elect the right MP, you could be said to have caused it to happen.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.