ChatterBank1 min ago
Mcgregor
93 Answers
I thought the Irish blood was all about honour?
Seems he has none.
A UFC fighter worth 85 million punched a man in the face in a bar, who was in his fifties, simply because he refused a drink from the professional UFC fighter.
He's been ordered to pay £860 and has avoided jail, even though his punches could be fatal to the average Joe.
https:/
Seems he has none.
A UFC fighter worth 85 million punched a man in the face in a bar, who was in his fifties, simply because he refused a drink from the professional UFC fighter.
He's been ordered to pay £860 and has avoided jail, even though his punches could be fatal to the average Joe.
https:/
Answers
Since the incident at Bellator 187 in 2017 he has lurched from one outburst to another and if he doesn't get this in check now he will lose everything he has worked for - worse than that, someone could die.
15:56 Fri 01st Nov 2019
//Andy I think professional fighters, especially those trained in MMA, should be punished more so than the average Joe for not only being in a fight with a public member, but for starting it and leaving without any reproduction or retaliation. //
Should a fireman who drops a fag butt be punished more than joe bloggs then because the fireman has been train how to deal with fires?
Should a fireman who drops a fag butt be punished more than joe bloggs then because the fireman has been train how to deal with fires?
//Did Ant McPartlin (may be wrong spelling) get a higher fine, because of his earnings?//
Yes he did. He was fined £86,000 - the largest fine in a British court for drink-driving. The recommended fine for his level of excess is a week and a half's income, which would have been reduced by a third for his guilty plea - so a week's income. That means he must have declared and annual income of around £4.4m to the court. Interestingly, had he been convicted of speeding he would have fared a little better. There is statutory provision to levy an unlimited fine for drink driving. However the statutory maximum for speeding is £1,000 (or £2,500 for an offence committed on a motorway). If Mr McPartlin had faced a speeding fine the most he could have been fined (assuming he pleaded guilty) is £667 (or £1,667 if on a motorway) regardless of his income.
Yes he did. He was fined £86,000 - the largest fine in a British court for drink-driving. The recommended fine for his level of excess is a week and a half's income, which would have been reduced by a third for his guilty plea - so a week's income. That means he must have declared and annual income of around £4.4m to the court. Interestingly, had he been convicted of speeding he would have fared a little better. There is statutory provision to levy an unlimited fine for drink driving. However the statutory maximum for speeding is £1,000 (or £2,500 for an offence committed on a motorway). If Mr McPartlin had faced a speeding fine the most he could have been fined (assuming he pleaded guilty) is £667 (or £1,667 if on a motorway) regardless of his income.
Yes I believe so, spicey.
In matters of violence the difference in fitness and ability between the two participants must always be a consideration. You would not expect the same sentence to be given to a fit 25 year old who thumped another similar 25 year old outside the pub as a fit 25 year old might be who had thumped an old lady in the High Street.
In matters of violence the difference in fitness and ability between the two participants must always be a consideration. You would not expect the same sentence to be given to a fit 25 year old who thumped another similar 25 year old outside the pub as a fit 25 year old might be who had thumped an old lady in the High Street.
