sir.prize, by 'pathetic' do you mean 'evoking sympathy' or 'ludicrously or contemptibly uninteresting or worthless', or one of the other definitions of the word?
I'm with you if it's 'ludicrously uninteresting'. The law allows and people tolerate homosexual couples having children by surrogacy, as they tolerate heterosexual couples doing so. It's natural for a couple to want a second child as a brother or sister to the first, thinking that, apart from anything else, an only child will not be as happy as a sibling.
If the age of the couple here is the concern, well, yes, they are both of an age when a woman would not be becoming a parent and one parent would be quite young. But that was the case with the first child. Why is it a matter of news and comment now?.