ChatterBank1 min ago
The Niqab Rears It's Ugly Head Once Again.
75 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-24 16632/M uslim-s tudents -banned -wearin g-niqab -Birmin gham-Me t-colle ge-secu rity-re asons.h tml
Was this college right to make this ruling?
/// Imaani Ali, 17, believes the ban on veils is a breach of her freedom ///
There are many things in life that breach our 'FREEDOM' Imaani Ali, they are mainly called 'RULES'.
Was this college right to make this ruling?
/// Imaani Ali, 17, believes the ban on veils is a breach of her freedom ///
There are many things in life that breach our 'FREEDOM' Imaani Ali, they are mainly called 'RULES'.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No-one is saying that AOG isn't free to make his points however he wants.
If anyone had tried to get this question banned, then you would have a point.
We haven't.
AOG posts questions that have a point, and we counterpoint.
If we didn't, then his questions, indeed, all of our questions, would run out of steam on page one, because it would just be people agreeing.
If anyone had tried to get this question banned, then you would have a point.
We haven't.
AOG posts questions that have a point, and we counterpoint.
If we didn't, then his questions, indeed, all of our questions, would run out of steam on page one, because it would just be people agreeing.
The connection attempted earlier on about an English bride's wedding veil and the niqab is completely specious. The veil is part of the wedding ceremony and is entirely symbolic, the bride at the alter lifts her veil and is then kissed by her husband symbolising their vowed unity, and is then no longer of any purpose.
Latest news on this issue; Birmingham Metropolitan University have just announced that they will not, after all, be enforcing the "niqab ban" after all, following protests, complaints and petitions.
Is this a "humiliating climbdown", as it has been described, or merely a recognition that their original premise has been described by some as draconian?
http:// www.bir mingham mail.co .uk/new s/local -news/b irmingh am-metr opolita n-colle ge-drop s-contr oversia l-59215 60
In that same article, it also touches on the other recent case concerning the niqab - the muslim women ordered to unveil by the judge - apparently the judge has now reversed that decision too, and allowed her to continue to wear her niqab in court, presumably subject to some kind of private verification of her ID.
Is this a "humiliating climbdown", as it has been described, or merely a recognition that their original premise has been described by some as draconian?
http://
In that same article, it also touches on the other recent case concerning the niqab - the muslim women ordered to unveil by the judge - apparently the judge has now reversed that decision too, and allowed her to continue to wear her niqab in court, presumably subject to some kind of private verification of her ID.