News1 min ago
Sky quiz live
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by toonmilo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Sorry about the last posting, it got submitted accidently, so I'll try again.
Today I watched the hundreds and thousands round of SkyQuizLive and they displayed in some order:
one hundred, century, millennium, 300 , 500/5 (actually 500 underlined with a 5 beneath it), 100 x 5, a monkey, ton.
My first answer was 27, which was given as wrong, and I could also come up with 1 (also given wrong) and 125 by counting one hundred and century together as 100.
No one got the answer, which apparantly was 75! I would like to know how they came up with it, because the presenter kept implying that the answer was straightforward yet I couldn't see it and I'm not stupid.
I had a quick look on the sky web site and couldn't see any solutions, but I noticed that point 6.2 of the terms and conditions on the website http://www.skyquizlive.co.uk/terms/ basically says that if the solution is wrong then tough (not that I'm at all cynical)!
This has really bugged me as well, so I hope someone has an answer. If I find one myself I will post it here.
Hello, My name is Brian from Swanage in Dorset. I hope my explanation will answer your question. I have myself also participated in these quizzes and for many months annoyed me also, but eventually after a long time working them out did eventually win money on the programme.
For example with this particular puzzle: You also have to think laterally as in count absolutely everything. The one thing that you forgot to count was ROMAN NUMERALS. e.g in the word CENTIPEDE - you have a C and a D. The letter C in roman numerals = 100 and the letter D = 500. these must also be counted in th answer and the same goes for any other words in the puzzle.
I found this very helpful and it seems to work for me.
Roman numerals, of course! How annoying that I didn't think of that - I'll put it down to being ill at the time (that was why I was at home off work). That said, judging by my original comments (it was a long time ago I saw the show) it seems that the presenter was making out that it was a lot more obvious than that.
Anyhow, many thanks for that bit of information Brian, this was something that really bugged me at the time so I am glad that someone took the time to explain (even though its months since you replied - the account is not on my main email address), and that I know that the answer was valid, albiet very sly!
Once again thanks for your answer, it has been gratefully received.
Colin, Vale of Glamorgan.