ChatterBank4 mins ago
Why Are Certain Abers Allowed To Highjack Certain Threads?
223 Answers
Today I had the need to ask the Editor to remove a perfectly reasonable thread appertaining to the recent riot taking place on a street in London.
From the off set this thread was high-jacked by certain members who obviously have taken a dislike to not only me personally, but also to the threads that I place on the news section of answerbank.
I did report one of the offenders, but no action against him was taken
The ED or someone else was good enough to remove the thread, but did not take the opportunity to chastise the offending members.
From the off set this thread was high-jacked by certain members who obviously have taken a dislike to not only me personally, but also to the threads that I place on the news section of answerbank.
I did report one of the offenders, but no action against him was taken
The ED or someone else was good enough to remove the thread, but did not take the opportunity to chastise the offending members.
Answers
AOG....no! no! no!...you have got it all wrong....... the Ed isn't interested and neither was the one before. I suggested many years ago when AB was again in turmoil, but for different reasons that certain ABers should be banned..... just my opinion. So what happened, the Ed banned the "characters" and made 2or 3 of the "troublemake rs" Moderators. Well that...
11:22 Sat 29th Jul 2017
You said "certain ethnic minorities" not all of them or some but "certain" minorities. That IS identifying particular groups but you refused to elaborate. You were on dodgy ground but rather than try to argue the point, you got in a strop and asked that the thread be removed.
By the way, if you insist on using "one" as in "one learns not to direct your criticisms" the "your" should be "one's" One wouldn't want folk to think one was pretentious, would one?
By the way, if you insist on using "one" as in "one learns not to direct your criticisms" the "your" should be "one's" One wouldn't want folk to think one was pretentious, would one?
Some contibutors to the (mainly) News Section take a perfectly valid story but spin/address it in such a way as to provoke a certain sort of response. AOG is particularly adept at this. He then revels in being able to run hither and yon declaring to all just how ill-used he is.....and is not above sucking his own bruises to emphasise the point.
It's generally as amusing as it is cringe-making.
It's generally as amusing as it is cringe-making.
JTH
"Some contibutors to the (mainly) News Section take a perfectly valid story but spin/address it in such a way as to provoke a certain sort of response. AOG is particularly adept at this."
Nothing wrong with that as in my opinion it is a valid approach to debate...e.g
"Should condoms be sold in the street?"
" Demand feeding an baby facilities"
"Some contibutors to the (mainly) News Section take a perfectly valid story but spin/address it in such a way as to provoke a certain sort of response. AOG is particularly adept at this."
Nothing wrong with that as in my opinion it is a valid approach to debate...e.g
"Should condoms be sold in the street?"
" Demand feeding an baby facilities"
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.