Are We Ever Going To Get Away From Gay Tv

[FrillyPancake]

Sorry guys. Am quite traditional, but I accept everyone I do. As they are whatever they are they are whatever WE are.

But,

Why is TV full of non heterosexuals. Mainly gay people these days.

Is it only me that feels this?

Well me and my husband that is?

Why is hetrosexuallness not being celebrated the same way it's like tables have turned big time?

Just my opinion....

[sunny-dave]

Indeed, Islay - every day is a gay day at Chateau Sunny Dave :+)

[HansUrbancka]

@ummmm........I wonder if our new Ed is aware that I never hounded Sqad. Although I did ask quite politely what were his qualifications.

However, you may Not wish to fill-in the whole of the story and say honestly what the outcome was and the opinions of other ABers at the time concerned.

Hans.

[gness]

Hounding and pestering is what I saw, Hans....not asking politely...

[EcclesCake]

Your recollection of events is quite different to mine Hans.

[ummmm]

Hans - you wouldn't let it drop even though you were told over and over again. That's hounding in my book.

[-Talbot-]

No manly beard and I've also been known to arrange some flowers :0(

[Khandro]

Positive discrimination for women I can go along with, after all, half of us are women, but with an estimated (by polls) less than 2% of the population being homosexual, they certainly get a lot of attention and effect a lot of self-serving favouritism.

[HansUrbancka]

Not to worry folks. I now feel that I am being hounded, so have reported the matter to Editor.

Hans.

[ummmm]

You're not being hounded. You're being answered.

[ladybirder]

You did hound sqad, Hans.

[anotheoldgit]

ummmm

/// If AOG wrote something like this he'd be ripped to shreds! ///

You and your compatriots are making a pretty good job of ripping this poor poster to shreds as it is.

Take your disgusting name calling :

/// You're simple a judgmental, homophobic bigot. ///

If that is not breaking Site Rules, I don't know what is, yet strangely enough it has been allowed to remain.

It must be because FrillyPancake has dared to make a valid comment against a protected species.

[ummmm]

Why on earth would that be against the Site Rules?

[anotheoldgit]

Mamyalynne

/// sometimes things posted on here leave me saddened and disillusioned and frankly shaking my head. ///

If that is really true, then why don't you follow those other's advice regarding certain TV programmes and channels, by keeping away from those particular AB categories?

[trt]

Morning all,

Islay, #Maybe Kvalidir wears a beard too.#

And a bikini, maybe?

[hc4361]

Protected species, AOG?

[anotheoldgit]

/// I'm not sure that bisexuality is really that difficult to understand. You don't have to like either The Beatles or The Rolling Stones, or Oasis or Blur - you can like both equally well! ///

What a very strange analogy to make, but then stranger things happen in the pop world I suppose.

[ummmm]

It's not a strange analogy.

[hc4361]

I suggest that anyone who cannot understand why Gay Pride and similar events exist should read The Kenneth Williams Diaries. Not an easy read.

[ummmm]

hc - can you give me a link to the actual book please? Amazon are bringing up loads.

[anotheoldgit]

hc4361

/// Protected species, AOG? ///

It would seem that one can make any number of negative remarks against Royalty, The Christian Church, Whites, Men, Heterosexuals, The Indigenous population of Britain or even the UK itself.

But dare to criticise, Islam, Blacks, Females, Homosexuals, Ethnic Minorities, and Foreigners, then one is in deep doo, doo.