Donate SIGN UP

Welcome To The Latest Archers Thread !

Avatar Image
mikey4444 | 07:58 Mon 29th Aug 2016 | Radio
198 Answers
The Archers: Helen Titchener's trial date set

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-37197247

God help anyone who phones me at 19:02 on Sunday !

Gravatar

Answers

101 to 120 of 198rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think you misunderstood Hellywell I was taking about Neil Carter (Susan's -The Gossips -Husband) who as to be a character for Helen.
Question Author
Lenny....where does your link come from ?
that's resurrection for you, helly.....
Sorry, UKWSF, I misread your post, and no, you didn't miss Neil. His evidence wasn't broadcast.
Mikey4444, I have all the omnibus editions of TA from November 2009 onwards on my laptop. I just went to the appropriate episode from 2011, used some software to get the relevant 4 seconds of the scream, and uploaded it to Soundcloud.
Watching the clock..........
Question Author
Won't be long now .......
35, 34 ...
21..20...
Meet up at 8pm to discuss then LOL?
Not sounding good!
Question Author
My God !............

Back at 20:01 !
Ohh, err.
Question Author
I am drained !

Back after Antiques Roadshow !
Do yous not think there was a sudden change of opinion to reach the verdict?
So where's Helen's home then? Her parents? Rob will still be at the cottage so she won't go back there. And will he just hand Henry to her? He certainly won't give up on getting custody of Jack/Gideon without a court fight will he?
I was surprised they reached a verdict so suddenly and wonder if it was what the foreman said about his own family? Who owns the cottage where Helen and Rob lived? I seem to think it belonged to Peggy but probably not.
Feeling completely drained.
Very disappointing really, the verdict seemed to hinge on the experiences of other jurors rather than the evidence, it seemed to fall apart once Havers told his tale of woe. Would Rob be able to approach Helen after the verdict so easily? I wonder if Ursula has taken Henry off somewhere. Not all over by any means.
//Would Rob be able to approach Helen after the verdict so easily?// Nope, because there would be an order of limitation preventing him to go within x 100 yards of her.
'Nigel' would have been exposed in the jury selection - no way would he ever have made the panel in a Crown Court.

101 to 120 of 198rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Welcome To The Latest Archers Thread !

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.