ChatterBank3 mins ago
Tougher Measures Covid
169 Answers
keen to hear :
1) if you believe tougher measures are needed lockdown wise.
2) what you believe these measures ought to include.
1) if you believe tougher measures are needed lockdown wise.
2) what you believe these measures ought to include.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by eve1974. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I was talking to a friend o Zoom yesterday. A friend of her's flew to the UK from another country. She took a test before she left her country - negative. When she got here she isolated at her mother's house for 14 days. Took another test - positive. I don`t think most people have any idea where people are catching covid.
Unless all the supermarkets are in agreement I can’t see much changing. Our local Sainsbury’s,Waitrose and M & S are pretty tough. They have signs at door saying just one person per trolley/basket and you MUST wear a mask. Then there is our local Lidl, which I can practically see from my house. Even though the security guy at door wears a mask half the customers don’t, they’re all going round in groups - gangs of teenagers all huddled together, and the staff don’t say a word. I know the staff aren’t obliged to, but it’s just mad - the store is packed anyway and no social distancing whatsoever.
It must be different areas then snow that are not wearing masks, because every supermarket I've been in over the last few months I've not seen anyone (not) wearing one.
What we are forgetting, and what this government want us to forget, is they have failed to get test track trace ( and support in place) you won't get people to stop at home if they can't pay their bills. Listening to 3 scientists this week they all say its exploded due to there being no TTT and support.
What we are forgetting, and what this government want us to forget, is they have failed to get test track trace ( and support in place) you won't get people to stop at home if they can't pay their bills. Listening to 3 scientists this week they all say its exploded due to there being no TTT and support.
//It is being strongly hinted that the 2 metre r//
What rule what that be then? The problem (mainly for the government) is that it isn’t a rule, people know that it isn’t a rule so they don’t comply (and it’s unenforceable anyway). We’re back to the Derbyshire problem; some people will not comply whatever is imposed but most people will do as they are required to do by law. If they’re not required to do it, they won’t. Changing something that isn’t a “rule” from 2m to 3m is simply absurd.
//…there were loads of people down by the Thames watching the fireworks i think, the police should have stopped that?//
No, emmie. They should not have had the fireworks. It’s no use on one hand telling everybody they are risking lives if they go out and on the other behaving as if everything is normal by putting on a firework display which is bound to attract people (otherwise why was it put on?)
// Compulsory vaccination…//
How, exactly, do you propose that is implemented?
// Should he drive to a park and cycle/jog there?//
So long as he doesn’t live in Derbyshire, he should be alright.
//I had an email from sainsbury's this morning telling me they are putting security guards on the doors making sure that people….are shopping alone//
Our branch tried that in the Spring. Mrs NJ and I simply took a trolley each. Split the list in half, met up from time to time in the store to discuss missing items, alternatives, etc. We spent far more time in the shop than if we’d shopped together, took up twice the space, had to use the checkout twice and each of us took longer to pack and pay than if we’d been together. A stupid idea which achieved little (people with three or four “children” – some of them young adults - were still allowed to shop together) and was quietly ditched. Now: “Let’s do it again. We know it achieved nothing last time but let’s give it another go. You never know, it might be different this time.”
The fact is, the virus will spread. The only way to prevent that is to keep everybody remote from everybody else and we can’t. Giving sensible advice will persuade most people to comply. Some won’t and threatening them with fines won’t change that.
What rule what that be then? The problem (mainly for the government) is that it isn’t a rule, people know that it isn’t a rule so they don’t comply (and it’s unenforceable anyway). We’re back to the Derbyshire problem; some people will not comply whatever is imposed but most people will do as they are required to do by law. If they’re not required to do it, they won’t. Changing something that isn’t a “rule” from 2m to 3m is simply absurd.
//…there were loads of people down by the Thames watching the fireworks i think, the police should have stopped that?//
No, emmie. They should not have had the fireworks. It’s no use on one hand telling everybody they are risking lives if they go out and on the other behaving as if everything is normal by putting on a firework display which is bound to attract people (otherwise why was it put on?)
// Compulsory vaccination…//
How, exactly, do you propose that is implemented?
// Should he drive to a park and cycle/jog there?//
So long as he doesn’t live in Derbyshire, he should be alright.
//I had an email from sainsbury's this morning telling me they are putting security guards on the doors making sure that people….are shopping alone//
Our branch tried that in the Spring. Mrs NJ and I simply took a trolley each. Split the list in half, met up from time to time in the store to discuss missing items, alternatives, etc. We spent far more time in the shop than if we’d shopped together, took up twice the space, had to use the checkout twice and each of us took longer to pack and pay than if we’d been together. A stupid idea which achieved little (people with three or four “children” – some of them young adults - were still allowed to shop together) and was quietly ditched. Now: “Let’s do it again. We know it achieved nothing last time but let’s give it another go. You never know, it might be different this time.”
The fact is, the virus will spread. The only way to prevent that is to keep everybody remote from everybody else and we can’t. Giving sensible advice will persuade most people to comply. Some won’t and threatening them with fines won’t change that.