Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Should the Police have intervened here?
http://www.dailymail....-DVDs-arrest-you.html
I am not a DM reader but saw this on the Mathew Wright programme when I came in from the Dentist
Were they right to go and tell the Cafe owner they would arrest him?
I am not a DM reader but saw this on the Mathew Wright programme when I came in from the Dentist
Were they right to go and tell the Cafe owner they would arrest him?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well, having received a complaint the police were duty bound to investigate it.
If the report is accurate (and I do mean IF), threatening to arrest him was not appropriate as the act makes incitement an offence, while saying that criticism of some kinds of sexual behaviour is not in and of itself an offence.
But I have no idea why the DM would make such a big thing of it ... quiet news day, perhaps ?
If the report is accurate (and I do mean IF), threatening to arrest him was not appropriate as the act makes incitement an offence, while saying that criticism of some kinds of sexual behaviour is not in and of itself an offence.
But I have no idea why the DM would make such a big thing of it ... quiet news day, perhaps ?
No, I don't think the police should have intervened because it all seems rather contradictory to me. The book's a best seller, and as far as I'm aware, not subject to censorship. It's acceptable to read the words from that book aloud in a public place, but it's not acceptable to show those same words on a screen. Odd.
If, as someone said, the owner makes it clear that it's a Christian cafe, I just wouldn't go in there. If that wasn't made clear and I happened to go in to be subjected to that nonsense, then I wouldn't be amused, but I wouldn't complain to the police.
If, as someone said, the owner makes it clear that it's a Christian cafe, I just wouldn't go in there. If that wasn't made clear and I happened to go in to be subjected to that nonsense, then I wouldn't be amused, but I wouldn't complain to the police.
They will stop them selling bacon butties next.
Incidentally nudgescuffler why did you find the reason to somehow excuse yourself by saying "I am not a Daily Mail reader but"...........?
It is almost like having to say "I am not a racist but"..........
There is no shame in reading the paper or it's web dsite. in fact most posters on here will take a news item from the DM and post it's link if it somehow helps to get their own particular viewpoint across.
Having said that however watching the Matthew Wright programme is much worse that reading the Daily Mail, at least one can choose what to read, which is different than watching his show and absorbing like a sponge everything he puts before the viewer.
Incidentally nudgescuffler why did you find the reason to somehow excuse yourself by saying "I am not a Daily Mail reader but"...........?
It is almost like having to say "I am not a racist but"..........
There is no shame in reading the paper or it's web dsite. in fact most posters on here will take a news item from the DM and post it's link if it somehow helps to get their own particular viewpoint across.
Having said that however watching the Matthew Wright programme is much worse that reading the Daily Mail, at least one can choose what to read, which is different than watching his show and absorbing like a sponge everything he puts before the viewer.
-- answer removed --
who said it was a gay ? the dm are assuming that in order to write lots of stuff about such filthy (unchristian) unnatural acts.
"Mr Murray said he had been given no indication of who had complained or which verses of the New Testament had caused the offence, but he guessed it may have been a reaction to the Book Of Romans that had been playing the week before. The Book takes the form of a letter from the apostle Paul to the people of Rome, in which he rails against all manner of godlessness."
the person who complained might have just been an atheist.
"Mr Murray said he had been given no indication of who had complained or which verses of the New Testament had caused the offence, but he guessed it may have been a reaction to the Book Of Romans that had been playing the week before. The Book takes the form of a letter from the apostle Paul to the people of Rome, in which he rails against all manner of godlessness."
the person who complained might have just been an atheist.
i was going off this
nudgescuffler
<Jamie Murray was warned by two police officers to stop playing DVDs of the New Testament in his cafe following a complaint from a customer that it was inciting hatred against homosexuals.>
If that's the case....absolutely.
>> inciting hatred against homosexuals.<<
have i put 2 and 2 together and got 5
nudgescuffler
<Jamie Murray was warned by two police officers to stop playing DVDs of the New Testament in his cafe following a complaint from a customer that it was inciting hatred against homosexuals.>
If that's the case....absolutely.
>> inciting hatred against homosexuals.<<
have i put 2 and 2 together and got 5
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.