AOG,
For the hard of understanding.......
http://news.sky.com/story/1040999/prince-harry-i-killed-taliban-in-afghanistan
Try and look past the sensational headline and listen to what he actually said. It's obvious that he was answering the first part of the question, which was basically that he was intimating that yes, he had fired upon the enemy.
People have foolishly taken that as a brazen "I killed the Taliban".
He did indicate that he had 'engaged' the enemy but "hasn't everyone out here". Or did you take that to mean that every single Serviceman out there has killed a Taliban fighter?
N.B. You will realise that the voice in the link is that of the actual English interviewer, not the 'added for effect from the studio' Australian one that asked him if he'd killed anyone in the link you provided earlier. As I posted earlier, the studio reporter coul dhave asked him if he'd set off some party poppers.
You will also note that in the written report, Harry's actual words are in inverted commas and reported accurately. No mention of the word 'kill' by him, though that hasn't stopped the Sky reporter from putting their own particular spin on it. Why would they do that I wonder? Because they know he didn't actually say that he had killed anyone.
So in closing, do you seriously believe that a Prince of these Isles would stand up and categorically state that he has killed someone?
What he did do is, as I've said before, conjure up an image and scenario's whereby he has had to engage enemy isurgents during his tour of duty as expected. He added no detail but instead left it to people's imagination as to what happens when engaged by an M230 Chain Gun.
The frankly pathetically wild, inaccurate reporting of what he said only supports his assertion that they print what they like anyway(as he said, no letter sent to his sister-in-law but that's not going to stop them) so people will doubtless get a mis-informed view of him.