Crosswords1 min ago
Beaten And Burned Alive By Mob In Uk
69 Answers
http:// www.the guardia n.com/u k-news/ 2013/oc t/29/vi gilante -murder -paedop hile-br istol-b ijan-eb rahimi
Brain dead is what these people are. It is beyond my comprehension. Eveybody should be charged who chanted when he was taken away for encouraging it. This really is horrible
Brain dead is what these people are. It is beyond my comprehension. Eveybody should be charged who chanted when he was taken away for encouraging it. This really is horrible
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ukanonymous. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Ymb....I had the great misfortune to grow up next door to a paedophile in the days when a child was not believed.
I think we have come some way from that and, while I would always want the perpetrator to receive the strongest punishment, even with my history I wouldn't want to see any form of mob revenge.
We do perhaps agree that punishment is not always handed down as it should be...so god knows what the answer is.
But I still don't think it's fear or needing to punish a perceived paedophile. I think in many cases it's an excuse to get a kick and thrill.
I think we have come some way from that and, while I would always want the perpetrator to receive the strongest punishment, even with my history I wouldn't want to see any form of mob revenge.
We do perhaps agree that punishment is not always handed down as it should be...so god knows what the answer is.
But I still don't think it's fear or needing to punish a perceived paedophile. I think in many cases it's an excuse to get a kick and thrill.
OK I shall try and reword my reply!!
These 'nonses' may have gone through the criminal law process - they will have had their sentances given out.
It is therefore a criminal act for these lynch mobs to take matters into their own hands.
And before you ask yes I have experience in law enforcement of these types of offenders!
These 'nonses' may have gone through the criminal law process - they will have had their sentances given out.
It is therefore a criminal act for these lynch mobs to take matters into their own hands.
And before you ask yes I have experience in law enforcement of these types of offenders!
What ymb is saying is that if paedophiles were "properly" disciplined then it wouldn't be assumed that somebody let out within a short time of being arrested was guilty.
There may be some truth in that. But, with the mentality of some thugs, it's a big ask.
I hope the full force of the law is applied to the two perpetrators and the three police officers, and anybody else who committed a crime (e.g. incitement, abuse, etc.). It would be good if the remaining community could plant a garden in Mr. Ebrahimi's memory ...
There may be some truth in that. But, with the mentality of some thugs, it's a big ask.
I hope the full force of the law is applied to the two perpetrators and the three police officers, and anybody else who committed a crime (e.g. incitement, abuse, etc.). It would be good if the remaining community could plant a garden in Mr. Ebrahimi's memory ...
You wrote that paedos are 'let out with a slap on the wrist'.
I'm not sure what newspapers you're reading, but c'mon - that's simply not true.
Stuart Hall...slap on the wrist? And that was for so-called 'historical' cases.
Jeremy Forrest - five and half year sentence, a slap on the wrist?
I can't think of any recent case that fits your profile of leniency of the judiciary...except one, where a judge summed up by saying the 14 year old child was not 'completely innocent'.
I'm not sure what newspapers you're reading, but c'mon - that's simply not true.
Stuart Hall...slap on the wrist? And that was for so-called 'historical' cases.
Jeremy Forrest - five and half year sentence, a slap on the wrist?
I can't think of any recent case that fits your profile of leniency of the judiciary...except one, where a judge summed up by saying the 14 year old child was not 'completely innocent'.
Well I am at a complete lost reading some of the posts.
Enough to say whatever this is a disgusting thing to have happened to this man, even if he was indeed a paedophile which reading the report he was not.
But there is more to this than is being reported, one he was just collecting evidence of certain actions that had previously taken place, then he must have been involved with these kids who apparently were committing acts of vandalism on his plants.
So some kids report him to their 'parents' ie "that man down the street has been taking pictures of us and trying to grab hold of us". Without further ado 'Macho' man and his friend go down to 'sort' the man out, calling him a paedophile etc. a crowd gathers and the police are called, the man in his fury has words with the police, and the police finally arrest him and take him
away. When the police check him out, they find that he has nothing to answer for so they release him, how could anyone forecast what would later happen to this poor man?
Now we come to come to the reason that these police officers have been suspended awaiting an inquiry, this we know nothing about, should they have arrested him? we don't know the circumstances, if they failed to do so there could have been even more trouble, especially if he happened to have been a paedophile, should the police have released him back to the area? they had no reason to detain him.
Seems to me the police are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Anyone any ideas how different the police could have handled this very sad case?
Enough to say whatever this is a disgusting thing to have happened to this man, even if he was indeed a paedophile which reading the report he was not.
But there is more to this than is being reported, one he was just collecting evidence of certain actions that had previously taken place, then he must have been involved with these kids who apparently were committing acts of vandalism on his plants.
So some kids report him to their 'parents' ie "that man down the street has been taking pictures of us and trying to grab hold of us". Without further ado 'Macho' man and his friend go down to 'sort' the man out, calling him a paedophile etc. a crowd gathers and the police are called, the man in his fury has words with the police, and the police finally arrest him and take him
away. When the police check him out, they find that he has nothing to answer for so they release him, how could anyone forecast what would later happen to this poor man?
Now we come to come to the reason that these police officers have been suspended awaiting an inquiry, this we know nothing about, should they have arrested him? we don't know the circumstances, if they failed to do so there could have been even more trouble, especially if he happened to have been a paedophile, should the police have released him back to the area? they had no reason to detain him.
Seems to me the police are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Anyone any ideas how different the police could have handled this very sad case?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.