News22 mins ago
Firearms Officer Wins Sex Discrimination Case Because Her Firearm Was Too Big For Her.
182 Answers
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/ukn ews/law -and-or der/106 43338/P etite-f irearms -office r-wins- sex-dis crimina tion-ca se-beca use-gun -was-to o-big-f or-her- hands.h tml
Well this just about takes the biscuit, why isn't there certain qualifications a person should reach before being accepted in certain positions in the police service?
Well this just about takes the biscuit, why isn't there certain qualifications a person should reach before being accepted in certain positions in the police service?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Apart from the usual sexist nonsense dressed up as 'humour' by some posters - or twenty-four carat sexism, depending if you wish to give them the benefit of the doubt or not -
this was clearly a discrimination case - there was an option to provide these candidates with correct equipment, and that option was not exercised, hence the case was found proven.
With regard to the original question '... why isn't there certain qualifications a person should reach before being accepted in certain positions in the police service?'
There are qualifications, and the ladies in question obviously passed them, otherwise they would not have been in the Armed Unit in the first place.
This was a skill test for existing officers, not a recruitment day when they were found unsuitable.
As the vast majority of posters accept - the case was valid, and its victory was the correct option.
For all those who want to try and make a case for women being 'unsuitable for men's work' - you will need to find another platform - this one clearly fails to support the weight of your views.
this was clearly a discrimination case - there was an option to provide these candidates with correct equipment, and that option was not exercised, hence the case was found proven.
With regard to the original question '... why isn't there certain qualifications a person should reach before being accepted in certain positions in the police service?'
There are qualifications, and the ladies in question obviously passed them, otherwise they would not have been in the Armed Unit in the first place.
This was a skill test for existing officers, not a recruitment day when they were found unsuitable.
As the vast majority of posters accept - the case was valid, and its victory was the correct option.
For all those who want to try and make a case for women being 'unsuitable for men's work' - you will need to find another platform - this one clearly fails to support the weight of your views.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.