Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Rolf Harris Trial Verdict
Rolf Harris Guilty on all charges
Answers
Lots of abusers are still very much alive and kicking and almost certainly still abusing. Google Elm Guest House for instance. Cyril Smith was never prosecuted because he knew where the bodies were buried. He didn't abuse boys in Rochdale on his own. Local journalists will tell you about the "dirty mac brigade" that used to turn up by train on a Saturday...
08:36 Wed 02nd Jul 2014
Someone said in relation to paedophilia- 'Monsters don't get close to children to abuse them- nice men do', which is pretty obvious when you think about it. Someone's personal charm, glamour or charisma isn't relevant to their sexual depravities, but they do enable them to obtain victims more easily.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
If you make a claim for compensation of this nature, you have to give a statement which is forensically analysed by a specialist, sometimes you have to give a handwritten account so they can analyse your handwriting too, and then finally you are subjected to interviews by forensic psychiatrists all of whom are used to whittle out liars and fantasists. This is a lengthy and distressing process, no-one would put themselves through this willingly unless they were genuinely deeply affected, and it doesn't help when people suggest that as victims, think about that word, VICTIM, they don't deserve something to make their sometimes shattered lives easier.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Whilst you are obviously entitled to your own opinion Jordy, you have had to get over a hue amounts of hard facts to reach it- I think that's what people are struggling with- you've ignored victims, police officers, psychiatrists, social workers, jury members and the judge, all of whom have the full facts whereas you don't , but you re still adamant that the man is innocent.
'Society' has punished Rolf by trying him for crimes we find abhorent and finding him guilty. It was a jury who found him guilty on the evidence presented before it and it sent out a message clearly stating that his actions have no place in a civilised society.
Why shouldn't those he directly harmed be entitled to receive monetary compensation from him?
Why shouldn't those he directly harmed be entitled to receive monetary compensation from him?
-- answer removed --