Jobs & Education2 mins ago
Arrested For Telling The Truth.
66 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.He was guilty though ... of not understanding precisely where the power lies in that particular interaction and behaving accordingly.
I may (and indeed often do) rail and moan on here about the utterly useless and incompetent UKBA (or whatever they are called this week) ...
... but at an airport, queuing for immigration, I am very, very quiet and polite.
I may (and indeed often do) rail and moan on here about the utterly useless and incompetent UKBA (or whatever they are called this week) ...
... but at an airport, queuing for immigration, I am very, very quiet and polite.
Six of one and half a dozen of the other
clearly the gentleman is being disingenuous:
‘all because I asked a question and apparently dared to use the M word.’
No
He was implying that only Muslims should be subjected to anti-terrorist searches - which is both stupid and rude
However, any notion that charges for racially or religiously aggravated disorder would be appropriate was way over the top.
Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS East of England, Frank Ferguson said: 'Following receipt of the evidential file a full review of the evidence took place.
'In order to successfully prosecute a charge of racially or religiously aggravated disorderly conduct, we first have to show that the language used was threatening or abusive'
Well that should have been obvious at the start and a word in his shell-like sufficient - saving a lot of expense and stress
R
clearly the gentleman is being disingenuous:
‘all because I asked a question and apparently dared to use the M word.’
No
He was implying that only Muslims should be subjected to anti-terrorist searches - which is both stupid and rude
However, any notion that charges for racially or religiously aggravated disorder would be appropriate was way over the top.
Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS East of England, Frank Ferguson said: 'Following receipt of the evidential file a full review of the evidence took place.
'In order to successfully prosecute a charge of racially or religiously aggravated disorderly conduct, we first have to show that the language used was threatening or abusive'
Well that should have been obvious at the start and a word in his shell-like sufficient - saving a lot of expense and stress
R
I think that there may have been a better way of dealing with it though- maybe making him go to the back of the queue.
It may have mean meant as light hearted but so are those comments by travellers who unwisely joke that they have a gun/bomb in their luggage the security staff don't take kindly to such comments.
I would hope the trades union would take a zero tolerance stance on racism as the union will undoubtedly have members of different races
It may have mean meant as light hearted but so are those comments by travellers who unwisely joke that they have a gun/bomb in their luggage the security staff don't take kindly to such comments.
I would hope the trades union would take a zero tolerance stance on racism as the union will undoubtedly have members of different races