The sad demise of a harmless British tradition, brought low by a phalanx of hairy feminists and liberal yoghurt knitters?
Or the welcome eradication of a blatantly sexist anachronism in what purports to be a family newspaper?
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jan/19/has-the-sun-axed-page-3-topless-pictures?CMP=share_btn_tw
You might assume from my inclusion of the words 'phalanx', 'anachronism' and 'purports' in the above questions, that I am one of the aforementioned liberal yoghurt-knitter, but personally I don't have any strong feelings one way or the other about the future of Page Three...
...other than it might make room for more stories about Kim Kardashian...which I think we can all agree is
a very bad thing indeed.
Your thoughts?