Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Leon Brittan
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Daffy6543. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I notice the use of "by all accounts" and "it is my firm belief" coupled with a previous phrase " for all of us in the know". Either what you know is fact or it is what you read in a book. If it is fact why have you not presented your factual evidence that YOU know personally to be true to the authorities ?
You do tend to jump in all guns blazing and make accusations of guilt on what you read, your belief and what you thought you saw but you have never provided leak proof evidence of what you proclaim.
You do tend to jump in all guns blazing and make accusations of guilt on what you read, your belief and what you thought you saw but you have never provided leak proof evidence of what you proclaim.
Ah, here we go again trial by media and Mickey.
Whatever happened to innocent until proved guilty, or are we now a left wing communist state where heasay is good enough to string you up?
I wonder what Mickey and Farrier will say when Labour MP's start being named, because they will. This lot are all in it up to their necks and I doubt they cared about party politics.
Whatever happened to innocent until proved guilty, or are we now a left wing communist state where heasay is good enough to string you up?
I wonder what Mickey and Farrier will say when Labour MP's start being named, because they will. This lot are all in it up to their necks and I doubt they cared about party politics.
from the died in the wool leftie who came out with these choice posts:
started off with the first reply
"Well, I guess the Enquiry on Historic Sexual Abuse won't be able to interview him after all. "
then has the front to post the following after getting a good hammering and lambasting
"This may have started as an obit thread but there has been a conspicuous lack of any positive comments from anybody whatsoever about Brittan. Its up to people to say something nice about him, and I am not stopping or discouraging anyone from doing that."
you dont even have the brains to realise or comprehend that you derailed the thread with your first post...not unusual though, so im not surprised
started off with the first reply
"Well, I guess the Enquiry on Historic Sexual Abuse won't be able to interview him after all. "
then has the front to post the following after getting a good hammering and lambasting
"This may have started as an obit thread but there has been a conspicuous lack of any positive comments from anybody whatsoever about Brittan. Its up to people to say something nice about him, and I am not stopping or discouraging anyone from doing that."
you dont even have the brains to realise or comprehend that you derailed the thread with your first post...not unusual though, so im not surprised
Napomi ( 09:23) Just got home from work and saw your post.
You are right...I have mentioned Danczuk's book many times before, but have you read it ? It is certainly not my only source of information about paedophile offences committed by high profile members of the "Establishment" but it does give a very good and full account of the way that the Security forces interfered and stymied official Police investigations. Danczuk was able to interview the Police Offices involved in the investigation of Smith, although he cannot name the Officers, out of concern for their own safety.
I will have a go at your question at 09:23.
There may very well have been copies, and it would be counterintuitive to suspect that Dicken's didn't make at least one. But the answer may lie in what happened shortly after he gave the dossier to Leon Britten. Dickens London flat and his constituency office were broken into but nothing was stolen. His son is on record for saying that he suspects that the "burglaries" were committed in an attempt to find copies of the dossiers, and any other papers associated with his accusation of paedophile activities"
You are right...I have mentioned Danczuk's book many times before, but have you read it ? It is certainly not my only source of information about paedophile offences committed by high profile members of the "Establishment" but it does give a very good and full account of the way that the Security forces interfered and stymied official Police investigations. Danczuk was able to interview the Police Offices involved in the investigation of Smith, although he cannot name the Officers, out of concern for their own safety.
I will have a go at your question at 09:23.
There may very well have been copies, and it would be counterintuitive to suspect that Dicken's didn't make at least one. But the answer may lie in what happened shortly after he gave the dossier to Leon Britten. Dickens London flat and his constituency office were broken into but nothing was stolen. His son is on record for saying that he suspects that the "burglaries" were committed in an attempt to find copies of the dossiers, and any other papers associated with his accusation of paedophile activities"
https:/ /thenee dleblog .wordpr ess.com /2014/0 7/03/si mon-dan czuk-mp -giving -eviden ce-to-t he-home -affair s-commi ttee-on -1st-ju ly-2014 /
Danczuk's naming of Leon Brittan occurs at about 20:01 in the embedded video clip, from the proceedings of Home Affairs Committee of the 1st July 2014. Its worth watching the whole clip as he discusses Cyril Smith paedophile activities at great length.
The following Telegraph link, explains how a senior Conservative MP
“stepped out of the shadows” to confront him, and tried to stop him naming Brittan in the Committee hearing.
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/ukn ews/cri me/1094 9366/Si mon-Dan czuk-I- was-war ned-not -to-cha llenge- Leon-Br ittan-o ver-pae dophile -dossie r.html
Danczuk's naming of Leon Brittan occurs at about 20:01 in the embedded video clip, from the proceedings of Home Affairs Committee of the 1st July 2014. Its worth watching the whole clip as he discusses Cyril Smith paedophile activities at great length.
The following Telegraph link, explains how a senior Conservative MP
“stepped out of the shadows” to confront him, and tried to stop him naming Brittan in the Committee hearing.
http://
Mikey, //Well, if you are not prepared to read Danczuk's excellent book, then I don't see the point of discussing this any further. It seems to me that its a case of
"Well, I have made my mind up, now don't confuse me with the facts"//
But you’re not confusing me with the facts, Mikey – I wish you were – but far from it. You’ve put your foot in your mouth by claiming that you are ‘in the know’ and ‘have all the names’, and now you’re squirming around for all you’re worth. If you have all the names, why haven’t you given them to the authorities – unless, of course, you refuse to discuss the matter with them unless they’ve read the book too?
"Well, I have made my mind up, now don't confuse me with the facts"//
But you’re not confusing me with the facts, Mikey – I wish you were – but far from it. You’ve put your foot in your mouth by claiming that you are ‘in the know’ and ‘have all the names’, and now you’re squirming around for all you’re worth. If you have all the names, why haven’t you given them to the authorities – unless, of course, you refuse to discuss the matter with them unless they’ve read the book too?
A former Speaker (Labour) of the House of Commons, who represented a South Wales constituency, whilst not a paedophile, had a penchant for under-age young men. This was skilfully covered up by another South Wales Labour MP, prominent for his efforts in the campaign to decriminalise homosexuality. Both are now dead. So, not just the Tories, then.
What the heck is your agenda here mikey? You seem to be in the know of all matters concerning paedophilia. Is your rather fervent interest about the evil abuse of young children a genuine concern for the damage and harm they have been subjected to, or, is it about your pathetic attempt to try to gain political point scoring? It seems you relish in pointing out that a Tory minister has some involvement in these sordid affairs. As you are so well informed in all that is going on and are in the know of all matters concerning paedophilia one could assume you are only spouting what is known as hearsay or you may have,dare one say, personal knowledge of what is happening in the world of paedophiles. All you know seems to be quoted from a book that is written by a Labour MP, This is the book that you constantly "urge people to read ". Before you charge me with a personal vendetta against you it might be pertinent to add that another ABer, only two days ago, happened to mention that your personal whipping boys on this site were paedophilia and UKIP .As you seem to relish in the, almost,childish delight of being "in the know"can you explain why the "Establisment" as you call it are still firmly established. You seem to purport you have friends in high places so please whisper in their ear of all your findings and knowledge on this matter. May be your friends in high places are complicit also!