News0 min ago
Surely These Two Should Not Even Be Considered For A Suspended Jail Term?
102 Answers
http://
/// Judge Mark Wall QC adjourned the hearing to read pre-sentence reports recommending the pair receive suspended jail terms. ///
/// Judge Mark Wall QC adjourned the hearing to read pre-sentence reports recommending the pair receive suspended jail terms. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Dougie // Alternatively the child could be possessed by demons and require regular beatings to drive them out. Yes, I'm kidding. //
Prof Gubbay = prof of medical history said: " that was in the books in the 1680s but people were as bright as we are - look at Newton and so on....
so they did it once perhaps and then did something else. But the books said still to beat them. This means that books are not a guide to what people did in the late seventeenth century......
and yes Git - I dont say this often
if it comes to being sentenced by one of her majesty's judges or yourself then I would choose one of her majesty's judges every time
[ blimey I really dont say that very often at all: I usually refer to them as blind stupid and toothless, ( and demented ) [ and { diseased } - syphilitic even - I am still on the subject of judges - deaf and brainless - incorrigible, useless opinionated ]
my support of her maj's judges is over
Prof Gubbay = prof of medical history said: " that was in the books in the 1680s but people were as bright as we are - look at Newton and so on....
so they did it once perhaps and then did something else. But the books said still to beat them. This means that books are not a guide to what people did in the late seventeenth century......
and yes Git - I dont say this often
if it comes to being sentenced by one of her majesty's judges or yourself then I would choose one of her majesty's judges every time
[ blimey I really dont say that very often at all: I usually refer to them as blind stupid and toothless, ( and demented ) [ and { diseased } - syphilitic even - I am still on the subject of judges - deaf and brainless - incorrigible, useless opinionated ]
my support of her maj's judges is over
Svejk - "Old QPQ has an awful lot to say for herself for a new member. It's unusual for people to start giving out gratuitous advice so soon after joining.
That's normally the preserve of long, long standing members."
We're trying to keep to the OP and not get into sledging each other – especially new members – it gives a bad impression of the AB.
Thanks.
That's normally the preserve of long, long standing members."
We're trying to keep to the OP and not get into sledging each other – especially new members – it gives a bad impression of the AB.
Thanks.
Svejk - "Don't want your 'thanks' or your advice, thanks."
Noted - but sledging new AB'ers is not acceptable, please remember Site Rules.
Noted - but sledging new AB'ers is not acceptable, please remember Site Rules.
AOG - "I am being honest! I am never anything less than honest – ever.
Oh yes?
/// Baldric - "Is this you Andy? ///
/// 07*** ****73, Music Journalist" ///
/// One down - wrong - four to go ... ///
/// For the record, I am a music journalist ///
?????????????????????????????"
The crux of the point was 'occupations'.
I am a music journalist in my spare time - which I have advised many times, and Baldric claimed to know what most people did for a living.
My occupation is an admin. job with BT - so music journalism is not my job.
Hope that clears up any confusion.
Oh yes?
/// Baldric - "Is this you Andy? ///
/// 07*** ****73, Music Journalist" ///
/// One down - wrong - four to go ... ///
/// For the record, I am a music journalist ///
?????????????????????????????"
The crux of the point was 'occupations'.
I am a music journalist in my spare time - which I have advised many times, and Baldric claimed to know what most people did for a living.
My occupation is an admin. job with BT - so music journalism is not my job.
Hope that clears up any confusion.
jack - "Oh, for Heaven's sake.....
Could you 'gentlemen' stop all the chest-thumping and willy-waving and nit-picking and address the topic to hand instead of trying to knock lumps off each other?
It is tedious and has spoilt numerous threads in recent times."
If you check the conclusion of yesterday's exchange, you will see that - as far as I am concerned - threads spiralling into spats will be avoided by my intention not to be drawn in - because you are right - it spoils threads, and goes nowhere.
Could you 'gentlemen' stop all the chest-thumping and willy-waving and nit-picking and address the topic to hand instead of trying to knock lumps off each other?
It is tedious and has spoilt numerous threads in recent times."
If you check the conclusion of yesterday's exchange, you will see that - as far as I am concerned - threads spiralling into spats will be avoided by my intention not to be drawn in - because you are right - it spoils threads, and goes nowhere.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.