Donate SIGN UP

Surely These Two Should Not Even Be Considered For A Suspended Jail Term?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 14:10 Thu 10th Sep 2015 | News
102 Answers
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/10/slamic-centre-birmingham-teachers-beat-pupil-so-badly-he-started-losing-his-hair

/// Judge Mark Wall QC adjourned the hearing to read pre-sentence reports recommending the pair receive suspended jail terms. ///

Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 102rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Talbot – “I could tell you all but Caran. (who is she?)”

Thanks – but you’re not the one being snotty and superior, so you are not the one having your bluff called.

I'm really not that bothered about your opinion Andy, so you're not a Music Journo then? especially when I think you're not being honest. I've also mentioned Caran, Ummmm works in an Office, possibly Admin and the others as far as I know haven't mentioned careers, I didn't claim to know everyone only those who'd mentioned Careers.
You must admit this is a bit of a coincidence though!
https://www.journalism.co.uk/freelancers/688
I'm a book-keeper. I know what Jack does but she's my friend in 'real' life, so it's something I would know. I think TTT works for a bank and Caran is retired.
Step out baldric. I notice that umm flies wingman for ah and I am relatively new on here.
Baldric – “I've been here as a casual user of the site for about 7½ years and have a pretty good idea who does what …”

Well now, that really isn’t true is it? No point being lofty with me and boasting about ‘knowing people’ when clearly you know nothing more than anyone else on here – myself included.

For the record, I am a music journalist – I am flattered that you have gone to the trouble to research me – why, God only knows, have you nothing better to do?
But to be accurate – music journalism is my hobby, I work for BT that is my occupation – any regular on here could tell you that.

Anyway, I have just finished a day’s fighting with one AB’er, I don’t intend to start another war with you, so hopefully you will think before being rude next time.
TTT – “all pretty standard stuff from the R.0.P. - good to see the usual defence of the indefensible from the F.0J.”

Are we reading the same thread here?

I can only find one post that doesn’t find this treatment of a child unacceptable, and that is Sqad, who I would hardly class as an ‘***.”

Are you seeing something I am missing?

The only reasons I'm walking away for the moment are that the Dog needs a walk and it's also our 28th Wedding Anniversary, although we're not celebrating until Saturday, but I'm still going to spend some time with my Wife.
I'm not fighting but I'd have bet my last pound that you Andy were a music journalist. I've seen you refer to it countless times but I've never seen you say you work for BT. Shows what we know (said by one of the many ABers who read lots of posts but don't always join in). For the record I don't know what JTH does, I didn't think Ummmm worked, Caran is indeed retired and a constant holidaymaker,,,and Baldric is ex RM.
Sqad didn't say it was unacceptable, he quite rightly pointed out that many of us grew up with thwacks from rulers and slap on the legs.

AH, you're far too sensitive' I was unaware I had been rude to you!
Togo...very very wrong. It's only that over the last few months it seems a group of AB users latches on to every word Andy says so threads are no longer about the OP but Andy constantly defending his stance/opinion.

I enjoy reading a good debate but when it's 5 plus people against 1 it starts to make uncomfortable reading especially when some seem to go out of their way to misunderstand the understandable.

-- answer removed --
Erm. I always believed (still do) that 'ignorance of the law is no excuse'. So why is it being considered as a defence here?
^^^ That was in reply to EDDIE's post.
Prudie...at the expense of my lovely OH I dossed for a few years. I'm back at work now :-)
I didn't know Ummmm, hope you like what you're doing:-)
Prudie – “I'm not fighting but I'd have bet my last pound that you Andy were a music journalist. I've seen you refer to it countless times but I've never seen you say you work for BT. Shows what we know (said by one of the many ABers who read lots of posts but don't always join in). For the record I don't know what JTH does, I didn't think Ummmm worked, Caran is indeed retired and a constant holidaymaker,,,and Baldric is ex RM.”

I assure you I am not fighting either! I was just midly put out to be pulled up for being ‘out of touch’ simply because I didn’t know Sqad was retired – hardly a hanging offence is it?

My part-time job / hobby as a music journalist crops up because it is far more interesting that my office job with BT, but I mention both when points are pertinent – obviously music crops up more than office work!

So that was my reason for a little light-hearted joshing with Baldric – hopefully he is not going to try (and fail!) to turn into another tedious battle with me – there are those on here who seem to think that is a valuable use of their time, and devote considerable amounts of time and anger it, I have absolutely no idea why!!

Have a good evening x
Debate is the word umm. If we do not agree with a point do we say nothing until we feel the weight of argument is counter to what we think, rather than be judged as bullies by self appointed adjudicators?
divebuddy - "Be honest Andy. You know perfectly well that Sqad is retired and living in Spain. You phrased your comment to him the way you did just to make a dig."

I am being honest! I am never anything less than honest – ever.

I honestly had no idea of Sqad’s age, only that he was involved in the medical profession – I have no idea doing what. I had no idea that he was either retired, or living in Spain. I am sure he has mentioned these facts, and no doubt I have seen them, but they have not registered as important enough to be remembered.

You are reading far more into this than is there – I would not have a ‘dig’ at Sqad, why would I? He is far too thick-skinned to be bothered by anything I might say to him – we differ on many things, and have agreed such, but neither of us do ‘digs’.

And I am mystified why my post would be construed as a ‘dig’ anyway – I was being perfectly serious. I think Sqad’s attitude to this child abuse is appalling, he would expect me to say that, and he won’t care tuppence, and that is absolutely fine.

Hope we have cleared up that misunderstanding.

41 to 60 of 102rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Surely These Two Should Not Even Be Considered For A Suspended Jail Term?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.