Film, Media & TV0 min ago
The Queen And Brexit
What are your thoughts?
http:// www.the guardia n.com/m edia/20 16/mar/ 09/pala ce-sun- queen-b acks-br exit-ip so
Part of me totally believes that she said what has been reported, because when Nick Clegg was questioned, he responded that he "didn't recall Her Majesty making those comments."
To me, "don't recall" is political code for "Yep...it happened, but if I say I don't recall it, and in future it's proved it happened, I've got a get out clause."
Also, if the Queen had expressed support for the leave campaign, Clegg is hardly likely to admit it, right?
But the other side of me thinks that the Queen is way too careful to blab about this...especially in front of MPs!
But then the *other* part of me looks at the reports of this and can see that the papers (pro exit) are all over the place on the detail of the conversation (it happened at a lunch, no - a dinner, in front of Nick Clegg, no - Michael Gove etc)
http://
Part of me totally believes that she said what has been reported, because when Nick Clegg was questioned, he responded that he "didn't recall Her Majesty making those comments."
To me, "don't recall" is political code for "Yep...it happened, but if I say I don't recall it, and in future it's proved it happened, I've got a get out clause."
Also, if the Queen had expressed support for the leave campaign, Clegg is hardly likely to admit it, right?
But the other side of me thinks that the Queen is way too careful to blab about this...especially in front of MPs!
But then the *other* part of me looks at the reports of this and can see that the papers (pro exit) are all over the place on the detail of the conversation (it happened at a lunch, no - a dinner, in front of Nick Clegg, no - Michael Gove etc)
Answers
The Queen is a constitution al monarch with no (official) bias in issues concerning the governance of the realm. If she confides such views to a politician who is not acting in his official role, they do not exist in the public domain. They are nothing more than meaningless tittle tattle fit only for the redtop gutter press.
21:51 Wed 09th Mar 2016
I can not know the rights and wrongs but the Palace is supposed to sstay out of politics so af course they would deny the story whether it was true or whether it was false. In much the same vein Cleggy isn't going to want to confirm it either. The sad part is that even if Lizzy had that much sense, her opinion as largest welfare claimant ought not to hold any weight anyway so it's a bit of a "storm in a teacup".
Old_Geezer
I'm slightly leaning towards believing the Palace, because the Queen has been pretty scrupulous about keeping out of politics (apart from the stumble back in the 90s with Thatcher).
That coupled with the fact that the palace has complained to IPSO.
But then...the Sun seem very bullish on this.
Tomorrow will be interesting, as there is bound to be a follow-up story.
I'm slightly leaning towards believing the Palace, because the Queen has been pretty scrupulous about keeping out of politics (apart from the stumble back in the 90s with Thatcher).
That coupled with the fact that the palace has complained to IPSO.
But then...the Sun seem very bullish on this.
Tomorrow will be interesting, as there is bound to be a follow-up story.
I find it very hard to imagine HM unleashing her views in front of what appears to be a mixed bunch of politicians; she's spent decades doing just the opposite. And while saying "I don't recall" is indeed a useful strategy, in case Clegg missed or misheard the odd sentence, he was pretty clear that he didn't really believe he'd missed anything so significant as a royal denunciation of the EU.
On the other hand, what Gove (if it was he) thought he heard, I don't know, though he clearly thought it was worth breaching the queen's confidence to push his political case, which seems rather bad form.
On the other hand, what Gove (if it was he) thought he heard, I don't know, though he clearly thought it was worth breaching the queen's confidence to push his political case, which seems rather bad form.
The Queen is a constitutional monarch with no (official) bias in issues concerning the governance of the realm. If she confides such views to a politician who is not acting in his official role, they do not exist in the public
domain. They are nothing more than meaningless tittle tattle fit only for the redtop gutter press.
domain. They are nothing more than meaningless tittle tattle fit only for the redtop gutter press.
Clegg said on Twitter ...
Re Sun story. As I told the journalist this is nonsense. I've no recollection of this happening & its not the sort of thing I would forget
That's believable. And it's also quite unbelievable that the Queen would say it ... she's far too canny.
But I suppose the thought is out there now. Job done for the Brexiters.
Re Sun story. As I told the journalist this is nonsense. I've no recollection of this happening & its not the sort of thing I would forget
That's believable. And it's also quite unbelievable that the Queen would say it ... she's far too canny.
But I suppose the thought is out there now. Job done for the Brexiters.