Quizzes & Puzzles35 mins ago
The Thin End Of The Wedge?
Here we go, the Muslim agenda commences;
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/u k/home- news/bo dy-sham ing-adv erts-ba nned-lo ndon-tr ansport -tube-s adiq-kh an-a707 9591.ht ml
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The best way to lose weight is by diet and exercise, not pills! Pills should not be encouraged, our daughters shouldn't be made to think thin is attractive. Our sons shouldn't be made to feel that a 6 pack makes them more attractive.
Our kids don't have to be fat to be made to feel they are overweight.
Our kids don't have to be fat to be made to feel they are overweight.
> All those adverts can adorn buses and tubes without using pictures which belong in lads mags.
I think you have missed the point completely.
Some people want to live their life in such a way that they prepare a nice, fit, toned shapely body for the beach. Why should they be denied advertisements that help them to do so, as long as the advertisements are for legal products?
One reason could be that the advertisements are for unhealthy products (e.g. cigarettes), but that is not the reason given for banning these ads. The reason given is that the adverts "make people feel ashamed of their bodies or pressured into looking a certain way." But the same might be said of many other ads. E.g. an ad showing a young, tall man in a nice suit may make an older, short man feel ashamed of his body - should the suit ad be banned?
I think you have missed the point completely.
Some people want to live their life in such a way that they prepare a nice, fit, toned shapely body for the beach. Why should they be denied advertisements that help them to do so, as long as the advertisements are for legal products?
One reason could be that the advertisements are for unhealthy products (e.g. cigarettes), but that is not the reason given for banning these ads. The reason given is that the adverts "make people feel ashamed of their bodies or pressured into looking a certain way." But the same might be said of many other ads. E.g. an ad showing a young, tall man in a nice suit may make an older, short man feel ashamed of his body - should the suit ad be banned?
It's understandable we've got side tracked into the bigger topic of advertising - however the premise of the OP was...
'Here we go, the Muslim agenda commences' - implyinmg this was a new occurrence.
When in fact the adverts and others similar have been the subject of protests and petitions and even the odd semi dressed demonstration for well over a year.
'Here we go, the Muslim agenda commences' - implyinmg this was a new occurrence.
When in fact the adverts and others similar have been the subject of protests and petitions and even the odd semi dressed demonstration for well over a year.
Ellipsis
You asked:
an ad showing a young, tall man in a nice suit may make an older, short man feel ashamed of his body - should the suit ad be banned?
That is reductio ad absurdum.
Might have spelled that wrong but...
I'm interested to hear whether you think that Mayor Khan's ban is indicative of some underlying Islamic extremism, as Khandro appears to believe.
You asked:
an ad showing a young, tall man in a nice suit may make an older, short man feel ashamed of his body - should the suit ad be banned?
That is reductio ad absurdum.
Might have spelled that wrong but...
I'm interested to hear whether you think that Mayor Khan's ban is indicative of some underlying Islamic extremism, as Khandro appears to believe.
I agree with Mamyalynne. The question of scantily clad females advertising lingerie on the tfl escalators has long been subject of outrage and I recall it was the feminists howling about demeaning the female body etc etc.
Khan did not instigate this recent display of objection but boy does he know how to jump in and seize an issue to suit his own agenda. Boris seemed to busy himself with more important issues when this was raised long ago.
Khan has now pleased the feminists and shown his muslim credentials at the same time.If Khan was that concerned all these years in London ( after all he was the son of a London bus driver :-)) he might of said he was going to ban this advertising in his mayoral election manifesto. Pure opportunism by Khan imo.
Khan did not instigate this recent display of objection but boy does he know how to jump in and seize an issue to suit his own agenda. Boris seemed to busy himself with more important issues when this was raised long ago.
Khan has now pleased the feminists and shown his muslim credentials at the same time.If Khan was that concerned all these years in London ( after all he was the son of a London bus driver :-)) he might of said he was going to ban this advertising in his mayoral election manifesto. Pure opportunism by Khan imo.
andy-hughes
/// Not having a faith, I cannot speak for how much, little, or it at all, his faith influenced him here - but my point is, there is no indication of it, except in Khandro's fertile imagination. ///
No need for the sarcastic rudeness Andy.
And how do you or anyone else for that matter know that his faith didn't have something to do with his decision?
Only Sadiq Khan knows, and he is hardly likely to admit that it is for his religious beliefs.
/// Not having a faith, I cannot speak for how much, little, or it at all, his faith influenced him here - but my point is, there is no indication of it, except in Khandro's fertile imagination. ///
No need for the sarcastic rudeness Andy.
And how do you or anyone else for that matter know that his faith didn't have something to do with his decision?
Only Sadiq Khan knows, and he is hardly likely to admit that it is for his religious beliefs.