ChatterBank3 mins ago
Isle Of Wight Mp Steps Down After 'gay Danger Remark'
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-hamps hire-39 749203
An old dinosaur that should have stepped down years ago, IMHO.
Good riddance !
An old dinosaur that should have stepped down years ago, IMHO.
Good riddance !
Answers
Sqad But the procreation argument doesn't make sense, unless gay people are biologically incapable of producing children. And let's face facts - closeted gay people have been producing kids for millennia. So - homosexualit y in itself cannot possibly be dangerous to society. What would be accurate is this: "Homosexuali ty is dangerous to society, when...
13:46 Sat 29th Apr 2017
Togo
"Let me give you a clue Kromo, that was your line^^. Of course he has no right to an opinion.....you say so.(and of course others) "
Liar. Where did I say he has no right to an opinion?
You're making stuff up. All that anyone has said is that his opinion is stupid.
Do you really consider that to be censorship? Because if you do, I strongly encourage you to grow up.
"Let me give you a clue Kromo, that was your line^^. Of course he has no right to an opinion.....you say so.(and of course others) "
Liar. Where did I say he has no right to an opinion?
You're making stuff up. All that anyone has said is that his opinion is stupid.
Do you really consider that to be censorship? Because if you do, I strongly encourage you to grow up.
Lets just say he is denied the comfort of holding his own opinion by the wolf pack mentality of the vociferous minority. It is no different to denying such a personal opinion, when it is howled down and publicly called stupid or worse. Like I keep saying our "friends" with the Libz and the rainbow coalition brook no such thing as free speech or opinion unless it is their own of course. Now that is living a lie, practitioners of Newspeak all.
"Denied the comfort of holding his opinion"!
Some impressive mental gymnastics there, gotta hand it to you.
"Denied the comfort of holding his opinion." Poor lamb. A sitting member of parliament, too. My heart bleeds for him.
Why can't we just exist in a perfect state of freedom where if someone says something silly, you aren't allowed to infringe upon their "comfort" by criticising them? That sounds like a positive direction for free speech, doesn't it?
Being criticised is not censorship, Togo. You know full well it isn't. Stop making crap up.
Some impressive mental gymnastics there, gotta hand it to you.
"Denied the comfort of holding his opinion." Poor lamb. A sitting member of parliament, too. My heart bleeds for him.
Why can't we just exist in a perfect state of freedom where if someone says something silly, you aren't allowed to infringe upon their "comfort" by criticising them? That sounds like a positive direction for free speech, doesn't it?
Being criticised is not censorship, Togo. You know full well it isn't. Stop making crap up.
Far from being 'howled down' his comments stunned the room into silence and then the 'discussion-after-the-fact' took place on Social media.
Of course he is allowed to hold any opinion he chooses but to vocalise those opinions to a room full of people about whom he knows absolutely nothing is naive in the extreme, if he had expectations that they would not be challenged.
Of course he is allowed to hold any opinion he chooses but to vocalise those opinions to a room full of people about whom he knows absolutely nothing is naive in the extreme, if he had expectations that they would not be challenged.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.