Donate SIGN UP

Better Together?

Avatar Image
maggiebee | 11:41 Fri 28th Jul 2017 | News
24 Answers
Better together?? - 'British' soldier from Scotland, denied treatment in England... I know that when Scottish people get treatment in England, the Scottish NHS pays for it (NHS in England/Scotland are different) but is this not a bit ridiculous?

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/…/this-ultimate-slap-face-form…
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 24rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by maggiebee. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Link does not seem to work, maggie.
Question Author
Oops, will try again.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/this-ultimate-slap-face-former-10885724

If this doesn't work I'll just give up!
Surely the army should be paying?
What a disgraceful state of affairs. I can't think of anything more practical to say - sorry.
But in any case it doesn’t surprise me.

The ridiculous devolution arrangements put in place for the three minor constituent parts of the UK was always going to lead to such scandals. To shovel money from England to the other parts and then set up a bureaucracy to claim it back is bad enough. But to deny somebody treatment on the basis of the part of the UK they come from is scandalous.

Lance-Corporal Brown is entitled to feel miffed. Strangely enough this girl:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malala_Yousafzai

was also treated in the Queen Elizabeth hospital in Birmingham (the same place that told L/Cpl Brown they could no longer tend his wounds). I don’t recall there being any argument about whether she would be treated there or not on the basis that she did not come from England, When things like this happen the UK becomes the laughing stock of the civilised world. Devolution is one of the most ridiculous fiascos that UK politicians have presided over in recent years (and there have been plenty to choose from). I suppose we’d all better watch out when travelling outside our “Home Nation” (but still within the UK, which is the nation that “national” in NHS refers to).
"Surely the army should be paying?"

Why? Organisations that see their employees injured whilst in their employ do not routinely pay for their medical treatment. That's why we have a (so-called) National Health Service. And in any case, who funds the Army? The same people who fund the NHS. So we need another load of scribes to transfer money from the Army (Benefactors: the hard-pressed taxpayer) to the NHS (Benefactors; the hard-pressed taxpayer).
Jackdaw, doesn't the Army come under National as in NHS?
And instead of getting the Army to pay for treatment to injured troops, if the NHS has any spare scribes doing nothing they would be better employed securing payment for medical treatment provided to foreign (i.e. non-UK) visitors. Apparently people running the NHS seem to suggest that they have neither the time nor the inclination to do this properly so I don't see how they've got the resources to oversee the transfer of cash from one taxpayer funded organisation to another.
The military used to run its own hospitals. Now that they no longer do I think it only right that they pay for treatment they would have once provided.
Jackdaw you are talking rubbish. Why do you think they should have to pay for their own treatment when they pay NI like everyone else does?
You misread me. I meant the army should pay
No link- file not found message.
Sorry, found it now.
you can thank Saint Tony and all this Devolution BS. Perhaps "independence" is an option.
Surely the answer is for him to continue his treatment at the hospital with NHS Scotland funding the cost.
Ludicrous in my opinion, his treatment should continue.
“You misread me. I meant the army should pay”

So once again: Where does the army gets its funding from? Where does the NHS (in all parts of the UK) get its funding from? As you say, the army no longer has its own military hospitals and that’s scarcely L/Cpl Brown’s fault.

“Surely the answer is for him to continue his treatment at the hospital with NHS Scotland funding the cost.”

Why? He lives in the United Kingdom. He served in HM Armed forces (which represents the entire United Kingdom). The funds managed by NHS Scotland (whatever that might be) come from the United Kingdom’s taxpayers, not solely Scottish taxpayers. Presumably it has an English counterpart and its funds do not come solely from English taxpayers.

This business is a farce of the first order and it is people like L/Cpl Brown who are the victims of political nonsense.
NJ, I appreciate that he lives in the UK and that Scotland is part of the UK but they have their own NHS, so if he lives in Scotland it would be incumbent upon the Scottish NHS to fund his treatment.
Having said that I agree that it is a farce.

1 to 20 of 24rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Better Together?

Answer Question >>