"Is it a possibility, yes or no?" -- How is that even a meaningful question?
I don't think anyone can seriously believe that immigration hasn't had the slightest impact in this country, its culture, and how the people interact. Of course it has.
But for this to be a serious question worth asking, then it follows that you need more than just a statement of the obvious.
So:
"Could This Rapid Rise In Attacks On Lgbt People Be Attributed To The Rise In Foreign Cultures Into This Country?"
a) Do you mean partially, mostly, somewhat or wholly attributable? Obviously the scale of the impact is important, rather than its possible existence.
b) What causes have you to ask the question in the first place? Have you become aware of such attacks being perpetrated in greater numbers by immigrants?
c) Is the level of attribution to immigration that you suspect proportional merely to the rise in the number of immigrants, so that if, say, immigrants are responsible for 10% of attacks, then 10% more immigrants would only lead to a marginal (1%) increase overall? Or do you think that immigrants are disproportionately responsible? Again, what evidence have you for such a claim?
Contrary to andres' sycophantic BA, asking you to provide evidence is *not* an attack. It's a reasonable question. If you are going to link such despicable actions to such a large number of people, it's worth explaining why, for what reasons, and what evidence you have to back up those claims. Otherwise you're just drawing a spurious link and creating controversy for no obvious reason.
I'm not disputing the existence of such a link per se, but I can't see the point in posing a question without any particular evidence to motivate it. And yet you do this all the time.