since it's becoming increasingly accepted that gender is less about chromosomes, appearance or reproductive ability but more a matter of state of mind not necessarily requiring reassignment intervention (and the gender recognition act 2004 is likely to be amended to reflect this), are the "X-X" denizens of the Kenwood Ladies Pond Association being a tad unreasonable?
No...'men' who transition have lived their lives with a man up until reassignment surgery. The surgery means that their bodies now look how their mind feels.
And in any case, there's no such thing as a singular experience of being a woman. Women have millions of permutations, outlooks, experiences and lives.
The one thing that is true is that every woman is different.
// the real ignorance lies with the man who, despite having no experience of being a woman,.....//
the real ignorance is complete confusion between gender and anatomical sex - everyon here agrees that anatomically there can be ambiguous genitalia but the people they are attached to may not be confused as to gender
hey we need a new word:
haeccity which I havent quite invented
"that property or quality of a thing by virtue of which it is unique or describable as ‘this (one)’.the property of being a unique and individual thing."he has a paramount concern with haecceity, the thisness of things"
Togo and sp1814 are both men but they are also separate - show haeccity ( they are different beings as well as being men)
as far as I can see - this can occur with gender - someone can say "I'm girl!" and another can say "I'm a girl too!" and yet they can be different as well.
just saying
[actually I just wanted to show Mushie I had done more than secondary school and what better than to dust off a philosophical concept from the fourtheenth century]
hey everybody if you need haeccity for things then it is
"quiddity"
(PHILOSOPHY - the inherent nature or essence of someone or something. 2. a distinctive feature; a peculiarity. "his quirks and quiddities")
Since they are men and need surgery to appear as women, they are clearly pretending. The brain may be 'wired' such that they feel they are women, but they aren't.
as far as I'm concerned, anyone with a woman's body should be allowed into the women's pond without having a DNA test - which is the way it is now. I don't care how they've come by the body.
You've said that someone who is physically a man can have a brain which is wired in such a way that they feel they are women. If that's the case, then they're not 'pretending' to be a woman.
When someone transitions, they have to spend two year living as a member of the opposite sex, whilst undergoing a battery of psychological tests by mental health professionals. This is critical to verify that the patient actually has gender dysmorphia.
Once again a minority of people are ruling the majority.
There is nothing wrong with a Ladies pool or sessions or whatever. As a man even I can appreciate they want to fee safe and free from stares.
A lot of the current trans gender nonsense masks the issue a few people really have, and they re ally are a few. I suspect attention seeking is more of an issue for these people as it seems many people who have a real identity "issue" get on with it without shouting to the whole world.
SP at 11:04, Dressing up in frilly undies and a dress doesn’t make them women, and insisting on being referred to as ‘she’ or ‘her’ doesn’t make them women. Whatever they are they’re not women.