ChatterBank0 min ago
Nigel Farage Has Suggested That A
second referendum would be decisive once and for all in favour of leave, do you agree?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-52 57959/N igel-Fa rage-ca lls-Bre xit-ref erendum .html
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by emmie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.So we must remain in a situation that, to the majority of those who bothered to vote, was unacceptable, simply to retain "political stability"?
Politicians are elected to facilitate the lives of their constituents. If they cannot do that without the country becoming "poliutically unstable" then that's a problem they need to address. There is no need for the electorate to tolerate things they don't want simply because the measures needed to change it are a little tricky.
Further than that, I would suggest that the current "instability" (which is, compared to some other EU nations, nothing of the sort) would be a walk in the park if we remained in the EU whilst the Euromaniacs embarked on the latest phase of their "ever closer Union" Crusade.
Politicians are elected to facilitate the lives of their constituents. If they cannot do that without the country becoming "poliutically unstable" then that's a problem they need to address. There is no need for the electorate to tolerate things they don't want simply because the measures needed to change it are a little tricky.
Further than that, I would suggest that the current "instability" (which is, compared to some other EU nations, nothing of the sort) would be a walk in the park if we remained in the EU whilst the Euromaniacs embarked on the latest phase of their "ever closer Union" Crusade.
Doesn't sound one of his brightest ideas. The decision has been made. A second referendum result, whether the same or different, will kill nothing off; it just drags one into the EU process of voting until the powers that be get the result they want. Best of 3, best of 5, best of 797 ?
The question has been answered, the only sensible next step is to implement it. Future governments can revisit the details again if the agreements made this time around are screwed up and the present government capitulates massively and thus fails to ensure we've left in anything but name.
The question has been answered, the only sensible next step is to implement it. Future governments can revisit the details again if the agreements made this time around are screwed up and the present government capitulates massively and thus fails to ensure we've left in anything but name.