ChatterBank16 mins ago
100 Plus Youths Attack Police Outside Stratford Bus Station, Near The Westfield Shopping Centre In London.
107 Answers
Interesting to note that the Sun reported that
'One youth appeared to be armed with a long stick as troubled flared'
That so called youth was in fact a police officer.
https:/ /www.th esun.co .uk/wp- content /upload s/2019/ 06/NINT CHDBPIC T000498 261860. jpg?w=6 20
https:/ /www.th esun.co .uk/new s/93064 10/yout h-gang- bombard -police -lawles s-londo n/
'One youth appeared to be armed with a long stick as troubled flared'
That so called youth was in fact a police officer.
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.pumpjack - // before i even read the article, i bet they were not white british youths. //
It appears from that observation, that you are willing to assume that the violence referred to can only have been caused by youths who are not British by birth, and are not white - based entirely on your ownb prejudice, and backed up by no evidence whatsoever.
// call me racist if you like but i say it how it is..i do not care about this pathetic label thrown out so much by pathetic liberals //
Thanks, I will call you racist, because that is what your post indicates that you are - and ironically, you do not 'say it how it is' at all - you offer an opinion on something about which you admit you know nothing at all, and the available evidence proves that you are wrong, so you are actually saying it how it isn't.
I am not a 'pathetic liberal', and the epithet 'racist' is not pathetic either, and certainly not something to be proud of, as you appear to be from your post on here.
It appears from that observation, that you are willing to assume that the violence referred to can only have been caused by youths who are not British by birth, and are not white - based entirely on your ownb prejudice, and backed up by no evidence whatsoever.
// call me racist if you like but i say it how it is..i do not care about this pathetic label thrown out so much by pathetic liberals //
Thanks, I will call you racist, because that is what your post indicates that you are - and ironically, you do not 'say it how it is' at all - you offer an opinion on something about which you admit you know nothing at all, and the available evidence proves that you are wrong, so you are actually saying it how it isn't.
I am not a 'pathetic liberal', and the epithet 'racist' is not pathetic either, and certainly not something to be proud of, as you appear to be from your post on here.
" call me racist if you like but i say it how it is..i do not care about this pathetic label thrown out so much by pathetic liberals "
You know it's illegal to be racist? It's not a word like "snowflake" it actually has rather a serious amount of gravity to it.
It is regarded as a hate crime and the 'fact you don't care' won't stop you from getting into trouble if you publicly share that view in the wrong place or at the wrong time.
You know it's illegal to be racist? It's not a word like "snowflake" it actually has rather a serious amount of gravity to it.
It is regarded as a hate crime and the 'fact you don't care' won't stop you from getting into trouble if you publicly share that view in the wrong place or at the wrong time.
andy-hughes
pumpjack - // before i even read the article, i bet they were not white british youths. //
/// It appears from that observation, that you are willing to assume that the violence referred to can only have been caused by youths who are not British by birth, and are not white - based entirely on your ownb prejudice, and backed up by no evidence whatsoever. ///
Where has pumpjack ever suggested that? the poster only said white British youths, nothing at all about the attacking youths not being British by birth, that is only how you wanted to interpret it to suit yourself.
It is shown they were not White British youths, but Black youths some who may have be born British and some who may not have been, you don't know if they were all British born and neither do I, all your accusations against pumpjack are a figment of your prejudices and not that of pumpjack.
pumpjack - // before i even read the article, i bet they were not white british youths. //
/// It appears from that observation, that you are willing to assume that the violence referred to can only have been caused by youths who are not British by birth, and are not white - based entirely on your ownb prejudice, and backed up by no evidence whatsoever. ///
Where has pumpjack ever suggested that? the poster only said white British youths, nothing at all about the attacking youths not being British by birth, that is only how you wanted to interpret it to suit yourself.
It is shown they were not White British youths, but Black youths some who may have be born British and some who may not have been, you don't know if they were all British born and neither do I, all your accusations against pumpjack are a figment of your prejudices and not that of pumpjack.
spathiphyllum
/// SR you think racism and hate crime is legal? ///
It is for the law to consider if an act of racism or hate crime has been carried out, not for any lay person to accuse others of carrying out those crimes.
Surely that is slander if it is spoken or libel if written or published, also punishable by law.
/// SR you think racism and hate crime is legal? ///
It is for the law to consider if an act of racism or hate crime has been carried out, not for any lay person to accuse others of carrying out those crimes.
Surely that is slander if it is spoken or libel if written or published, also punishable by law.
"It is for the law to consider if an act of racism or hate crime has been carried out, not for any lay person to accuse others of carrying out those crimes. "
That's the biggest load of tripe i've ever heard, AOG.
You'll find it is my right to consider what i deem is racism or a hate crime. Not the laws. The law, will then inspect and maybe act on my findings.
Do shift out of automatic, try put a gear into manual.
https:/ /www.ci tizensa dvice.o rg.uk/l aw-and- courts/ discrim ination /hate-c rime/ra cist-an d-relig ious-ha te-crim e/
That's the biggest load of tripe i've ever heard, AOG.
You'll find it is my right to consider what i deem is racism or a hate crime. Not the laws. The law, will then inspect and maybe act on my findings.
Do shift out of automatic, try put a gear into manual.
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.