ChatterBank5 mins ago
Ben Act Letwin Amendment Palava..
this is seriously getting on my nerves, this whole brexit thwarting tactics....errr
i just want to see an end to it, leave obviously..how long can this go on, court cases to stop it
were all going to die, were doomed etc etc.
i just want to see an end to it, leave obviously..how long can this go on, court cases to stop it
were all going to die, were doomed etc etc.
Answers
I too don't understand the logic that No Deal (aka WTO terms) means impoverishme nt. The "Deal" is an alternative to the Lisbon Treaty. It is not a trade deal. Either the EU and the UK will agree a trade deal at a later date or they will not. I would like to think that pragmatism would prevail but since the EU is involved that cannot be guaranteed. In that case both...
17:44 Sat 19th Oct 2019
No, I don't think I did. It was mentioned but dismissed.
I still accept the result. What I don't accept is the way in which it's being implemented. I don't see why, on its own merits, an arrangement that leads to a de facto customs border down the Irish Sea can be remotely acceptable to anybody. Nor is No Deal remotely acceptable -- to deliberately impoverish ourselves and our neighbours cannot be what Leave Voters had in mind.
I still accept the result. What I don't accept is the way in which it's being implemented. I don't see why, on its own merits, an arrangement that leads to a de facto customs border down the Irish Sea can be remotely acceptable to anybody. Nor is No Deal remotely acceptable -- to deliberately impoverish ourselves and our neighbours cannot be what Leave Voters had in mind.
I too don't understand the logic that No Deal (aka WTO terms) means impoverishment. The "Deal" is an alternative to the Lisbon Treaty. It is not a trade deal. Either the EU and the UK will agree a trade deal at a later date or they will not. I would like to think that pragmatism would prevail but since the EU is involved that cannot be guaranteed. In that case both sides will be the losers. But there is no reason to agree to Lisbon II just so that life can go on as normal.
Why do we have to leave the EU to have business deals with the rest of the world? What's stopping us from dealing with non-EU countries anyway?
Of course Tory Tory Tory Man blames everyone for the current situation, except the rebel Tories who failed to support their own PM in the first place. Ipso Fatso.
Of course Tory Tory Tory Man blames everyone for the current situation, except the rebel Tories who failed to support their own PM in the first place. Ipso Fatso.
"If frictionless trade is good for NI then why not for the rest of the UK ;-)"
Because it comes with a sting in the tail, that is, loss of sovereignty for that part of the UK. NI may prefer that to having a hard border with the south of the island, but it's that, and the concern that having a hard border might trigger off the murderous scum, that makes them a special case. But this surely just points out the obvious, sorry about that.
Because it comes with a sting in the tail, that is, loss of sovereignty for that part of the UK. NI may prefer that to having a hard border with the south of the island, but it's that, and the concern that having a hard border might trigger off the murderous scum, that makes them a special case. But this surely just points out the obvious, sorry about that.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.