Donate SIGN UP

So Boris

Avatar Image
weecalf | 16:01 Sun 24th Nov 2019 | News
119 Answers
Has his photo on the manifesto never seen that afore and I’m nearly 40
Gravatar

Answers

101 to 119 of 119rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by weecalf. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
Nah sorry too tall
Dash it.
Your mirth is misplaced, mamyalynne. It isn’t about identifying individual zappers of individual posts - that would be impossible so the notion, although often repeated is, in itself, wholly illogical. On principle moderators should be known because anything less is disrespectful to the whole membership. Secrecy engenders suspicion, mistrust and an ‘us and them’ mentality - and that is never conducive to harmony.
I've noticed, only mildly comic not mirthful as such.
I don't feel disrespected and I would be surprised if every other AB member, other than me, felt disrespected.
Nor do I.
Corby, you misunderstand. Unwarranted secrecy is disrespectful. Without that this same old complaint wouldn’t constantly arise. It creates suspicion and that creates unnecessary waves - and that’s a pity.

Night all.



Only for a few.
How many complaints would be addressed to those known to be Mods, especially if a Mod takes part in a thread where posts have been deleted?
I don’t see complaints being addressed to the half a dozen or so known mods now so there’s no reason to believe that would change. Mods don’t know any more than anyone else anyway so complaining to them would be pointless. I simply think this culture of secrecy engenders suspicion and mistrust - and that’s damaging.
go to just about any other online forum/board and mods are openly identified ..when they post you can see who mods are.
this site lives in the dark ages...
How would the way AB functions be improved by knowing who the Mods are?
i know that WBM is one, he doesn't keep it a secret.
There's no suggestion that AB function would be improved, simply that the concept of 'us and them' and the suspicion and mistrust that produces would be diminished, hence making for a more pleasant atmosphere.
If folk think the Mods are not doing their jobs propery, they should be letting the ED know their concerns.

I, for one, have no concerns and have no burning desire to know the names of the Mods.
emmie //i know that WBM is one, he doesn't keep it a secret.//
Neither do I.
DANNY, I didn't know you are a Mod or if I did, I forgot that fact. I wasn't aware WBM is a Mod.

Chances are, I'll forget but maybe some are keeping a note of all the names for future reference.
G'afternoon dannyk13...I admire you for Not hiding the fact that you are a Mod. Not an enviable position in the light of a recent statement from AB Spare Ed..."Our moderators have been selected for their abilities to moderate whilst remaining impartial. They act in accordance with The AnswerBank's Site Rules."

I now see it as being the case that, should a Mod disagree with the opinion of an ABer, the Mod is Not remaining impartial.

Your comments will be appreciated.

Hans.
Why would a mod not wish to known to the AB community. . .?

101 to 119 of 119rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6

Do you know the answer?

So Boris

Answer Question >>