Big Sheep Christmas Quiz 2024.All...
Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Tommy In Trouble Again...
Answers
I wouldn't depend on the tabloids to report the truth.... especially when they're on the warpath against someone.
00:15 Tue 03rd Mar 2020
royfromaus - // Amended.
Maybe because she is the daughter of Tommy Robinson you think she deserved it. (just remember during your forthcoming rant, you started it) //
That appeared while I was writing my reply.
Because you took the trouble to direct such a disgusting thought to me personally, it is even less worth the dignity of a response.
I am happy to debate your views and opinions, but not your vile insinuations - your choice as to whether we proceed further or not.
Maybe because she is the daughter of Tommy Robinson you think she deserved it. (just remember during your forthcoming rant, you started it) //
That appeared while I was writing my reply.
Because you took the trouble to direct such a disgusting thought to me personally, it is even less worth the dignity of a response.
I am happy to debate your views and opinions, but not your vile insinuations - your choice as to whether we proceed further or not.
royfrumaus - // andy-hughes
I am not going to dignify such rank stupidity with a response.
Why not?
I responded to your post of rank stupidity and lies. //
I have not lied, you can think my post is rank stupidity if you wish, but I will not be accused of lying.
I am not going to dignify personal insults with responses, that's how threads spiral out of control and get deleted.
Stick to the point, I will answer, make a fool of yourself with pointless nasty undeserved insinuations, and you are on your own.
I am not going to dignify such rank stupidity with a response.
Why not?
I responded to your post of rank stupidity and lies. //
I have not lied, you can think my post is rank stupidity if you wish, but I will not be accused of lying.
I am not going to dignify personal insults with responses, that's how threads spiral out of control and get deleted.
Stick to the point, I will answer, make a fool of yourself with pointless nasty undeserved insinuations, and you are on your own.
Mozz71
Roy, do we know if that has been confirmed, or reported to the police?
According to Tommy Robinson (in the video), the alleged attacker admitted to both him and the police that he did touch the child's bottom although this was an accident and not an assault.
The truth may surface but then again, it may not.
Roy, do we know if that has been confirmed, or reported to the police?
According to Tommy Robinson (in the video), the alleged attacker admitted to both him and the police that he did touch the child's bottom although this was an accident and not an assault.
The truth may surface but then again, it may not.
Royfromaus - // According to Tommy Robinson (in the video), the alleged attacker admitted to both him and the police that he did touch the child's bottom although this was an accident and not an assault. //
Returning to my point about being a father protecting his child - if someone brushed against my daughter in a public place and it was an accident, I would not be minded to assault him for it.
Just one of the many many differences between 'Tommy' and most reasonable sensible parents in the world.
Returning to my point about being a father protecting his child - if someone brushed against my daughter in a public place and it was an accident, I would not be minded to assault him for it.
Just one of the many many differences between 'Tommy' and most reasonable sensible parents in the world.
royfromaus - // Once again, you are trying to justify thuggish behaviour from a man who is famous for it
that is an out and out lie. //
I am not sure how familiar you are with the methods of debate on here, it appears you are not because you fail to grasp the difference between what someone makes of what you say, and someone who tells something that is not true about what you say.
If you think I have lied, report my post, that is your right, otherwise shall we drop what is becoming a diversion to the topic we are discussing.
that is an out and out lie. //
I am not sure how familiar you are with the methods of debate on here, it appears you are not because you fail to grasp the difference between what someone makes of what you say, and someone who tells something that is not true about what you say.
If you think I have lied, report my post, that is your right, otherwise shall we drop what is becoming a diversion to the topic we are discussing.
AH; //No I wouldn't - for the simple reason that Elton Hercules John is Elton John's name - he changed it by Deed Poll in 1972.
Changing your name because, as a famous person you prefer another name is quite common, I have no issue with that.//
But Tommy Robinson IS a very famous person (though that fact may stick in you craw) so why make an exception?
I think you should own up; you really are trying to be smart aren't you?
Changing your name because, as a famous person you prefer another name is quite common, I have no issue with that.//
But Tommy Robinson IS a very famous person (though that fact may stick in you craw) so why make an exception?
I think you should own up; you really are trying to be smart aren't you?
royfromaus // Waffle all you like, it was a lie.
Point to where I excused thuggish behaviour. Put up or shut up. //
I don't think I am getting through to you - so once again -
I am not going to encourage you to divert this thread with your off-topic antagonism towards me.
If you feel I have 'lied' - report the post.
My interaction with you about that aspect of the debate is now ended.
Thank you.
Point to where I excused thuggish behaviour. Put up or shut up. //
I don't think I am getting through to you - so once again -
I am not going to encourage you to divert this thread with your off-topic antagonism towards me.
If you feel I have 'lied' - report the post.
My interaction with you about that aspect of the debate is now ended.
Thank you.
Khandro - // AH; //No I wouldn't - for the simple reason that Elton Hercules John is Elton John's name - he changed it by Deed Poll in 1972.
Changing your name because, as a famous person you prefer another name is quite common, I have no issue with that.//
But Tommy Robinson IS a very famous person (though that fact may stick in you craw) so why make an exception?
I think you should own up; you really are trying to be smart aren't you? //
'Tommy Robinson' is not famous, much less 'very famous' - his nonsense is hardly on a par with a global megastar recording and performing artist like Elton John.
What he is however, is notorious, which is not the same thing at all.
If you think my refusal to use his alter-ego label is 'smart', then that's fine by me.
Changing your name because, as a famous person you prefer another name is quite common, I have no issue with that.//
But Tommy Robinson IS a very famous person (though that fact may stick in you craw) so why make an exception?
I think you should own up; you really are trying to be smart aren't you? //
'Tommy Robinson' is not famous, much less 'very famous' - his nonsense is hardly on a par with a global megastar recording and performing artist like Elton John.
What he is however, is notorious, which is not the same thing at all.
If you think my refusal to use his alter-ego label is 'smart', then that's fine by me.
Mozz - // /What is a middle-aged man with no children of his own doing in the kiddies part of the pool complex?//
Where does it state the guy was on his own with no kids/family? I'm not saying he wasn't, but the original arrival says nothing of the like. //
I was about to make that point.
If Roy is referring to another media report, then a link would be of assistance in the ongoing debate.
Where does it state the guy was on his own with no kids/family? I'm not saying he wasn't, but the original arrival says nothing of the like. //
I was about to make that point.
If Roy is referring to another media report, then a link would be of assistance in the ongoing debate.
