That's the point I'm making Margie, if I'd have said it, nobody would've batted an eyelid, because it's Diddly, some arw acting as if she'd called the kid a *** or something. Double standards.
Sigh, look I'm leaving it as that, as the threads been derailed enough as it is. Sorry Maggiebee, your thread deserved better than that.
Since diddly denounces the Prime Minister for ‘committing adultery’ it’s hardly surprising that others consider her use of the word ‘sprog’ to be less than complimentary.
You didn't object to derailing the thread when you were having your say, Mozz, but expect everyone else to shut up when you think they should. Par for the course. However, in an effort to get the thread back on track, old fashioned names seem to be fashionable at the moment. I don't like the name Wilfred but if mum and dad do that's up to them. Welcoming a new baby into the world is a joy.
the natural first word to use that would spring to mind in for most people would kids, babies, children etc
you used it for the sole reason of having a subtle dig at him...stop lying...nearly everybody on here can see exactly what your little game is...
TWT - you clearly have a problem with regards to truth. Sprog, according to Chambers, is not derogatory. If I had written "What will Boris's next kid/child/offspring be called" you would still have had a go at me. Admit it.
Diddly//sprog, according to Chambers, is not derogatory. //
Then you, and Chambers, are wrong. In the RAF and the army it is a derogatory term for a recruit.
Army types might have used it to insult people but according to modern day usage from a more than reputable source it is not derogatory. Anyway, to get back to the original thread, who b***** cares what Boris's sprog is called?