Donate SIGN UP

Answers

81 to 100 of 323rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"Why people are so eager to distance these acts of terrorism from the source is beyond me - because until we are prepared to acknowledge that source we have no hope of combatting it. "

What do you think is the source and how do you think it should be combatted?
That's both me and Untitled who are wondering the same thing and would like an explanation. A coherent non-contradictory one if you can manage it. Please.
AH, it’s not a contradiction. It’s incumbent upon all Muslims to further the cause of Islam in whichever way they are able. Whether it be battle or otherwise, the guidance is there.
Come on Naomi, who did you mean by the 'source'?
Islam, zacs ... but then you knew that.
German police are not saying who or what is responsible
I hope does not upset the prognostications of the usual suspects
carry on boys and gurlz
Then why did you write, in contradiction to your admission 'I've made no assumptions. I've referred to this incident as 'the murders in Germany'

You can't write 'until we are prepared to acknowledge that source' and then say 'I've made no assumptions' unless you have a direct line to the police cheif in Trier which we don't know about.

You really are having a bad day, aintcha?
naomi - // AH, it’s not a contradiction. It’s incumbent upon all Muslims to further the cause of Islam in whichever way they are able. Whether it be battle or otherwise, the guidance is there. //

It is a contradiciton, and you denying it does not make it not so. The evidence is there, and everyone else can make up their mind.

You can convince yourself that your stance is consistent and unwavering, I can read and deduce that it clearly is not.

I expect your response to be one of your regular get-outs - you will either scoff and ridicule me, or you will ignore me - but either do not detract from you being found out as shifting your point of view as and when it suits you.
If the "source" is islam then how do you think islam should be combatted?
No, zacs, I'm not having a bad day - but you're trying hard as usual. Carry on. ;o)
Naomi will maybe use excuse 26b which manifests itself as 'Right....'
Ooooh I was wrong. Standard answer 25c. Apologies.
AH, I haven't shifted my point of view. I've always said the same. // It’s incumbent upon all Muslims to further the cause of Islam in whichever way they are able. Whether it be battle or otherwise, the guidance is there. //

Unless you expect grannies to go into battle ....
Come on N, man-up and give us an explanation as to why you mention a 'souce' and then, later, say you've made no assumptions?
"Why people are so eager to distance these acts of terrorism from the source is beyond me - because until we are prepared to acknowledge that source we have no hope of combatting it."

We now know that "the source" here is "Islam".

OK. Source acknowledged for argument's sake.

How shall we combat islam?
With guts and difficulty as Macron is learning now.
Untitled, I haven't said 'the source *here* is Islam'. As I've indicated, I don't know who committed this atrocity - but in answer to your question I don't think we can combat Islamic extremism. Best you ask someone else.
Question Author
sunk: "I find your attitude very reprehensible.
People have been horribly killed including a young child. I notice you have no sympathy for the victims. Your first instinct was to exploit the tragic event for political point scoring.
Very sad, and quite horrible. " - I think we have an example of the "So" rule without an actual so! Classic!
naomi - // AH, I haven't shifted my point of view. I've always said the same. // It’s incumbent upon all Muslims to further the cause of Islam in whichever way they are able. Whether it be battle or otherwise, the guidance is there. //

Feel free to address the posts you made, and I referred to, if you want to try and deny your contradictions.

Simply referring to a different post is blowing smoke - you know it and I know it.

Ok. If you don't think it is possible, then I'm not sure why you warned that we would have no hope of doing so without acknowledging that the source was Islam.

81 to 100 of 323rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last