Stanley Johnson

[grumpy01]

MP Caroline Noakes has accused him of touching her inappropriately at the Conservative Party conference in 2003.Dreadful man but why wait until now? https://news.sky.com/story/amp/stanley-johnson-accused-of-inappropriately-touching-senior-conservative-mp-12469482

[Redhelen72]

//AH, as a self confessed Mod, it’s you who has an atrocious attitude to Naomi, unbelievable !!//

I believe Ed has said time and time again that if you have concerns over how a MOD is acting that you need to contact them!

[Mozz71]

Carefull Ken, this thread doesn't look to be the kind of place for calm, reasoned thinking. There'll be a pitchfork wielding mob on your tail before too long.

[AuntPG]

The peasants have downed pitchforks for 'Tiffin' I think. :-)

[Mozz71]

They can't be outraged on an empty stomach APG.

[Bobbisox1]

Shush, the Sitting of a Kangaroo Court is in Session :0))’

[vulcan42]

She didn't name him but her description could only relate to one person.

[Ken4155]

^
Ulrika Johnson should have done likewise a few years back.

[Bobbisox1]

She named her ‘assailant’ didn’t she Ken?

[Ken4155]

^
Nope. She said "a tv personality" had raped her when she was 19. She actually said she felt sorry for John Leslie when he was accused of being the rapist.

[Ken4155]

Not sorry enough to spare him his ordeal though by naming the actual rapist.

[Bobbisox1]

And look how his career freefalled because of it

[Mozz71]

She didn't even have to name her attacker Ken, just stating that it wasn't Leslie would've been enough.

[naomi24]

AH,//as usual, you are being selective, omitting to mention that you think Ms Noakes is and I quote, 'muckraking' by bringing up the issue now.//

Oh how funny! There's gobbledegook if I ever saw it. I'm being selective in omitting to mention that //Ms Noakes is …blah blah// and then you quote me mentioning it.

//you are dancing around, being 'too busy' to address the challenges being offered to you.//

I've not said I'm too busy - and you've offered no challenges. I've given my opinion … like it or lump it.

Thanks Bobbi.

[andy-hughes]

naomi - // I've not said I'm too busy - and you've offered no challenges. //

Really? Perhaps you need my post at 11.34 re-worded for you in simplet English?

Try once again here it is - read it slowly -

// I am not 'being rude' to you, I am challenging your attitude and your hypocrisy, and as usual, you are dancing around, being 'too busy' to address the challenges being offered to you. //

The impotant words are - "I ... am ... challenging ... your --- attitude ... and ... your ... hypocrisy."

Have a think and come back to me, preferaby without your usual "I am saying no more ...' exit strategy.

[Peter Pedant]

// Oh how funny! There's gobbledegook if I ever saw it. //
er we have just been talking about rape innit?

oh well - er normalish day on AB - even I am surprised by AB's depths at times

[naomi24]

AH, I don't need to read it slowly or otherwise. I've read it - and, as so often happens, you're climbing up your own bottom again.

[naomi24]

PP, //we have just been talking about rape innit?//

I've not mentioned rape.

[Mozz71]

I love a good debate. I wonder if there's one going on somewhere?

[andy-hughes]

naomi - // AH, I don't need to read it slowly or otherwise. I've read it - and, as so often happens, you're climbing up your own bottom again. //

Coming from someone who denies beng challenged, and then (as usual!) serves around evidence of just such a challenge, that's rich!

Don't worry naomi, I know you will never answer a direct challenge, you never do.

But that speaks more to the imorality of your position, and your inability to defend it, than your smokescreening rudeness.

[naomi24]

AH, I have no idea what you're blathering on about. I disagree with you. It happens. Get over it.