Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Stanley Johnson
MP Caroline Noakes has accused him of touching her inappropriately at the Conservative Party conference in 2003.Dreadful man but why wait until now? https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by grumpy01. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
naomi - // AH, I have no idea what you're blathering on about. I disagree with you. It happens. Get over it. //
I would need to be remotely bothered by your twin attitudes of superiour groundless judgements coupled with an utter inability to discuss your views intelligently, to 'get over it'.
As usual, you flatter yourself with the imagined impact your repellent views and stubborn attitudes have on me.
Your posts are here for anyone to see - your views and your hypocrisy are available, I have no need to waste my time with you any further.
To coin a phrase, you too can 'lump it'.
I would need to be remotely bothered by your twin attitudes of superiour groundless judgements coupled with an utter inability to discuss your views intelligently, to 'get over it'.
As usual, you flatter yourself with the imagined impact your repellent views and stubborn attitudes have on me.
Your posts are here for anyone to see - your views and your hypocrisy are available, I have no need to waste my time with you any further.
To coin a phrase, you too can 'lump it'.
Innocent until proved guilty.
Is there any proof of this do we know?
To often these days we get trial by media. People who know they wont stand a cat in hells chance of getting anything to the Courts as its just he said she said so they opt for the smear campaign.
No idea whether thats the case here, but it is clear a smear is what is happening.
Is there any proof of this do we know?
To often these days we get trial by media. People who know they wont stand a cat in hells chance of getting anything to the Courts as its just he said she said so they opt for the smear campaign.
No idea whether thats the case here, but it is clear a smear is what is happening.
Have you read the full report bobbi or are you just 'joining in'? Stanley Johnson has not been accused of anything by Caroline Noakes. She has not gone to the press moaning about past inappropriate behaviour in a vain hope for retribution. If you can be bothered you, and anyone else making silly remarks and victim shaming, go read the full article or read my excerpt of it at 11.31
Bobbi - //
Just not gunna happen StickyB, oh and by the way, I did report it //
I have responded on this point to you more than once, but either you are ignoring what I post, or you don’t like or agree with it, or you simply think repeating your opinion will change things.
Hopefully, for the final time then –
I am an AB’er first and foremost, and it is an AB’er that I post and I am subject to the same rules as everyone else.
There are no exceptions for Moderators, nor are they expected to adhere to some imaginary ‘higher code’ of ethics whereby they are constrained from posting on the basis of their status.
Therefore, if you are complaining that you imagine that as a Moderator, I am not entitled to engage with naomi as I see fit, then I would suggest that your complaint is unlikely to receive the attention you believe it deserves, hence your repeating of it at regular intervals.
Hopefully you can accept that I am posting as an individual, the same as you, and if, on that basis, you wish to report anything I say, then of course that is your right, but please remember that Moderator status does not confer privileges, neither does it deny its holders the right to debate as they see fit, subject to Site Rules.
Thanks for your attention .
I now regard this issue as closed.
Just not gunna happen StickyB, oh and by the way, I did report it //
I have responded on this point to you more than once, but either you are ignoring what I post, or you don’t like or agree with it, or you simply think repeating your opinion will change things.
Hopefully, for the final time then –
I am an AB’er first and foremost, and it is an AB’er that I post and I am subject to the same rules as everyone else.
There are no exceptions for Moderators, nor are they expected to adhere to some imaginary ‘higher code’ of ethics whereby they are constrained from posting on the basis of their status.
Therefore, if you are complaining that you imagine that as a Moderator, I am not entitled to engage with naomi as I see fit, then I would suggest that your complaint is unlikely to receive the attention you believe it deserves, hence your repeating of it at regular intervals.
Hopefully you can accept that I am posting as an individual, the same as you, and if, on that basis, you wish to report anything I say, then of course that is your right, but please remember that Moderator status does not confer privileges, neither does it deny its holders the right to debate as they see fit, subject to Site Rules.
Thanks for your attention .
I now regard this issue as closed.
-- answer removed --
