//What are the specific results of this risk assessment?//
Not looked for a long time Corby. But with about 100k collisions involving injury, less than 2,000 deaths annually (and not all of them occupants of cars) among around 33 million cars on the road, the chances of me being killed or seriously injured are very remote. Far more remote, I would suggest, than the chances of the young girl in this thread being killed by peanuts.
But this isn't about me driving. I only discussed it because it was suggested that because I believe this child should not travel in an aircraft, then by that logic I shouldn't drive. The issue here is that the parents of this girl suggest she is at serious risk of death if she comes into contact with peanuts, presumably if their dust (or whatever) is airborne and a passenger aircraft is a very hazardous environment where that's concerned. If that's true, to rely on 300 or so other people acting responsibly when they are told of her predicament is very unwise. The question raised was should her parents put her at risk. I believe they should not and some bar steward deciding he is not going along with a reasonable request made by the cabin crew does not somehow absolve the parents of the responsibility to keep her safe. They should factor in the possibility that this might happen, not moan about it when it does.