ChatterBank0 min ago
Truss Conference Speech
175 Answers
Extraordinary she didn't see fit to acknowledge Boris Johson and give him one sentence of respect.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Paigntonian. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Paigntonian
//Fatt: A lot of contributors are getting terribly fed up with your knee-jerk and ill-considered remarks. I certainly am.//
You mean you, Davebro and Deskdiary? Lol.
Are you going to advise a break from AB for me too, just like them?
Davebro recommended I see a therapist…..despite him advocating machine-gunning immigrants on a beach!? Odd that you didn’t admonish him, too concerned with me eh?
Bless! Lol.
Or is it that you don’t like relevant points that question the mindset and actions of the beloved party? End of.
//Fatt: A lot of contributors are getting terribly fed up with your knee-jerk and ill-considered remarks. I certainly am.//
You mean you, Davebro and Deskdiary? Lol.
Are you going to advise a break from AB for me too, just like them?
Davebro recommended I see a therapist…..despite him advocating machine-gunning immigrants on a beach!? Odd that you didn’t admonish him, too concerned with me eh?
Bless! Lol.
Or is it that you don’t like relevant points that question the mindset and actions of the beloved party? End of.
Paigntonian
// Frankly weird that some decide that Truss is 'not intelligent'. Is Starmer 'not intelligent' or was Corbyn 'not intelligent'. It really is schoolboy stuff.//
Intelligence doesn’t necessarily mean credibility, confidence, skill nor ability but particularly so in the political sphere, that’s diabolically apparent.
Some don’t have the intelligence to recognise a party whilst they’re attending one.
// Frankly weird that some decide that Truss is 'not intelligent'. Is Starmer 'not intelligent' or was Corbyn 'not intelligent'. It really is schoolboy stuff.//
Intelligence doesn’t necessarily mean credibility, confidence, skill nor ability but particularly so in the political sphere, that’s diabolically apparent.
Some don’t have the intelligence to recognise a party whilst they’re attending one.
-- answer removed --
Paigntonian
//Frankly weird that some decide that Truss is 'not intelligent'//
May have missed it so am asking but:
Where in the thread did anyone claim she wasn’t intelligent?
Khandro
n. //Brains don’t necessarily equate to sense//
/This is true, but not the point, she was accused on here of not being intelligent./
Same question.
Paigntonian
//Naomi: A good point. But to call a successful City accountant, MP and Party leader 'thick' is just stupid.//
Who in the thread called her thick?
….or has someone read the ‘not very bright’ post and have feigned outrage to suit an agenda?
//Frankly weird that some decide that Truss is 'not intelligent'//
May have missed it so am asking but:
Where in the thread did anyone claim she wasn’t intelligent?
Khandro
n. //Brains don’t necessarily equate to sense//
/This is true, but not the point, she was accused on here of not being intelligent./
Same question.
Paigntonian
//Naomi: A good point. But to call a successful City accountant, MP and Party leader 'thick' is just stupid.//
Who in the thread called her thick?
….or has someone read the ‘not very bright’ post and have feigned outrage to suit an agenda?
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Paigntonian
//Fatt: How can I qualify my remarks when I didn't make the remarks? You accused me of a very unpleasant remark that I did not make. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. If course, you're not man enough to admit that you were wrong. Par for the course.//
You said you agreed with Davebro. You needed to qualify or quantify that remark. You failed to….badly.
As for man enough, you mean like you tried last night over the coup remarks by Braverman and the breaking story that the government were being evasive over the question of benefits?
The story was not a year old as you claimed, was it?
You disappeared though? Never mind.
//Fatt: How can I qualify my remarks when I didn't make the remarks? You accused me of a very unpleasant remark that I did not make. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. If course, you're not man enough to admit that you were wrong. Par for the course.//
You said you agreed with Davebro. You needed to qualify or quantify that remark. You failed to….badly.
As for man enough, you mean like you tried last night over the coup remarks by Braverman and the breaking story that the government were being evasive over the question of benefits?
The story was not a year old as you claimed, was it?
You disappeared though? Never mind.
some (not entirely relevant) fashion notes here
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ politic s/short cuts/20 22/oct/ 05/dict ator-ch ic-why- did-liz -truss- wear-th e-same- outfit- as-a-fi ctional -fascis t
https:/