Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

101 to 120 of 170rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Spicerack, you could be forgiven for thinking that. Me too! Scary innit! ;o)
We ain't accepting tonight's results either, according to your dear leader.
Before adding that people just have to accept that it can take many days, weeks sometimes, to add up all the votes cast. (but only in, ahem, certain States)
They're AB's answer to Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. ;-)
OK, I know this is pointless, but I'll have a go just for the record. Care to answer my question on the previous page - 13.04 I think - Spicerack?
Not without my lawyer's presence.
Seriously. See if you can do it. No sarcasm, just a straight answer. Imagine you're in the crossword puzzle section or something.
I could explain how they changed all the rules governing elections in the US for 200yrs. But you wouldn't read it.
When Biden said he had assembled the greatest election fraud team in history everyone laughed, me included.
What none of us realised back then was quite how senile he was.
This lead to him saying the quiet part out loud.
As for Trump's crime of the century, claiming the election was stolen. Lol, not only are the Democrats still claiming that the 2016 election was stolen by Trump/Russia, they are now claiming that he's going to steal the 2024 election.
Well, thanks. That's the best effort anyone's made. The only one in fact. Naomi's don't count because she just obfuscated and sidestepped.
Her usual MO, Tomus. It's only Naomi who calls it a witch hunt.
No, she's not, I have always called it a witch hunt too, both in Boris's case and Trump's !
You're just as deluded then, Shirley. Care to explain why trying to cheat in the election is acceptable?
JDavis, if you want a conversation try doing it without telling people who disagree with you they’re deluded. They are not deluded. They just disagree with you.
Maybe it's YOU who's deluded Davis !
Tomus. I haven’t obfuscated or sidestepped. I’ve responded to questions I don’t know the answer to by saying I don’t know. You should try it. It might render your deliberations more credible.
Pot/kettle there, Naomi. And convenient for you because you can't justify Trump's actions.
You've not answered the question, shirley, just as I expected. Why is it a witch hunt?
I don’t know what he’s done, JDavis - and neither do you. If the US justice system
ever gets around to charging him with a crime and finding him guilty, then we’ll both know.
Naomi,
You don't know the answer but you do know it's a witch hunt. That's great logic!
Aww so glad I haven't disappointed you !
How many times does it have to be said, naomi? It's all on record so we do know.

And tomus is obviously right about obfuscation.

101 to 120 of 170rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is The Trumpster Coming Back?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.