News0 min ago
Palace Racism
Ngozi Fulani was asked where she was originally from mmm, whats the problem there
it's not what or was considered a british christian name, i assume the palace get people from around the globe visiting, so why the big hoo haa.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-1 1486513 /Prince -Willia m-conde mns-una cceptab le-comm ents-go dmother -Lady-S usan-Hu ssey.ht ml
it's not what or was considered a british christian name, i assume the palace get people from around the globe visiting, so why the big hoo haa.
https:/
Answers
I think that the lady was asking where her family originated from. I think that is a genuine question, maybe not the time nor the place but it is hardly a major issue.
17:51 Wed 30th Nov 2022
No, methinks she will milk it for all its worth. Even if she has to libel, slander or otherwise malign the RF.
I remember years ago a bunch of Spaniards kept asking my mother and me where we were from. They would not have it that we were English and this went on for hours. We took it with the good nature with which it was intended.
I remember years ago a bunch of Spaniards kept asking my mother and me where we were from. They would not have it that we were English and this went on for hours. We took it with the good nature with which it was intended.
Naomi - // Now Ms Fulani has acknowledged that the comments were made without malice, i wonder if she apologised for jumping to the wrong conclusion and condemning Lady Hussey unnecessarily? //
Since there was only one conclusion that Ms Fulani 'jumped to' - which was that lady Hussey was not willing to accept her response of being British to Lady Hussey's question about where she came from, and her conclusion was that Lady Hussey was being offensive.
There is only one 'conclusion' there, and it requires no 'jumping to it', it is laid out in from of Ms Fulani, and repeated more than once.
As for the 'condemnation' of lady Hussey, I think you'll find the heavy lifting there was undertaken fairly and squarely by the media, and the royal family, with their responses.
Since there was only one conclusion that Ms Fulani 'jumped to' - which was that lady Hussey was not willing to accept her response of being British to Lady Hussey's question about where she came from, and her conclusion was that Lady Hussey was being offensive.
There is only one 'conclusion' there, and it requires no 'jumping to it', it is laid out in from of Ms Fulani, and repeated more than once.
As for the 'condemnation' of lady Hussey, I think you'll find the heavy lifting there was undertaken fairly and squarely by the media, and the royal family, with their responses.
Lady CG - // Even if she has to libel, slander or otherwise malign the RF. //
That's a pretty tall, not to say baseless assessment of future behaviour, which you cannot know.
Ms Fulani clearly has no argument with the Royal Family - since she chose to accept an invitation to one of their events.
And on that basis, why on earth would she 'libel, slander, or otherwise malign them' when they have clearly taken her side of events as being correct, and responded accordingly.
I think you are letting your imagination get the better of you.
That's a pretty tall, not to say baseless assessment of future behaviour, which you cannot know.
Ms Fulani clearly has no argument with the Royal Family - since she chose to accept an invitation to one of their events.
And on that basis, why on earth would she 'libel, slander, or otherwise malign them' when they have clearly taken her side of events as being correct, and responded accordingly.
I think you are letting your imagination get the better of you.