Does anyone ponder why so many British passport holding Sudanese are in Sudan?
One chap on the front page of today's Telegraph is weeping because he had left his wife & son there when he boarded the plane.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/04/27/sudan-evacuation-british-man-forced-leave-wife-son-flight/
He is described as a taxi-driver; I was wondering how a British taxi-driver can afford the time & money to take his family for a visit to Sudan, - any ideas please?
I think if British passport holders choose to live in an unstable dangerous place like Sudan, they should bear the consequences. I'm already fed up hearing about this, and think the warring factions should be left to get on with it - nothing to do with us anymore
I think if these British passport holders are on holiday, then yes bring them home. But those residing there .............leave them. They chose to live in an unstable country.
Imanaged to access tje version in the OP which states, "Mr Ahmed was a bus driver in Bedfordshire before returning to Sudan in 2014 to focus on farming."
A slight change regarding the farming but he was not a taxi-driver on holiday.
Out of interest, I just googled, 'Farming in Sudan' & got;
**What problems do farmers face in Sudan?
Throughout much of the country, water resources are limited, soil fertility is low, heat stresses are on the rise and drought is common. These conditions lead to loss of livestock, land and property, all of which are a major factor of impoverishment.**
//the comments above suggesting those uk citizens who reside in sudan should simply be left there are despicable and shameful//
WHY? If you choose to live in a country long-term surely you accept it with all its plusses and minuses not go scurrying for a safe(r) haven if something happens that you don't like.