If you really believe that this is an issue of whale meat then I would suggest you write to berate the Government of the US of A - perhaps try the house at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW.
An unprecedented upsurge in the consumption of whale meat by the (irradiated) Japanese immediately following WW2 was a direct result of that country having few resources combined with the US occupying authorities urging whale meat be offered in classroom lunches nationwide as a cheap source of protein. For centuries whale meat had been a delicacy; under US influence, whale meat became part of Japanese everyday life and accounted for around 50% of animal protein intake.
Consumption has dropped dramatically during the intervening decades - currently around 1% of that during the 1960s - to around 30g per head of population per year. Pork and Beef account for more than 20kg and 25kg respectively.
Anyhoo, a thread on whaling already exists with a few additional thoughts on the selective anthropomorphism of edible mammals ...
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question24 9621.html
If your argument had been limited to the Japanese claim of "scientific whaling" then we would have a shared opposition of a practice I view as needless barbarism.
cherrycherry - I thought the whale meat eaten by Britons in the aftermath of WW2 was from Norway?