ChatterBank6 mins ago
Chavs
Now that the scummy underclass that is the chav is being widely ridiculed by the press, is it now time we had a chav amnesty to allow them to turn in their burberry caps, hoodies, 'trackie bottoms' and cheap gold and allow them time to stop breeding at 13 and go out and get jobs like the rest of us have to do?
Do they actually know that they are chavs?
We call them pikeys 'round these parts, but as chav is the official 2004 buzz word, I guess we need to change.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by flanker. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The more people highlight them the better. Hopefully they will read comments written about them and realize �Hey, that sounds like me�.
Trisha watching, R&B listening, body kitted Vauxhall Nova driving, Burberry wearing, chain smoking, lager drinking, incessant swearing, puffer jacket wearing, illiterate a***holes. Roy Carroll (lottery winner), prime example.
DEFEND THEM AT YOUR PERIL!
That�s got that off my chest.
BigDogsWang - Apart from the joke thread, I haven't laughed so much in ages, especially after reading your comments. You've got the CHAVY families down to a fine art! We used to shop in the local Asda when it first opened, but it attracted so many of them, that we now shop back at Sainsbury's (well apart from when I fancy a George clothes shopping spree that is)!
When you look at some of the little children with their big looped earings, yes boys too - you really can't hold out much hope for them. It is such a shame because they are the next generation! What a legacy to be left by your parents!
NoGoodBoyo you need to wake up and smell what you're shovelling! There is no connection between 'Chav' and 'human being'!
Don't you realise that it is Chav's who have absolutely no tolerance of human beings? They are the scum sucking, illiterate, benefit scrounging pond life that is the festering boil on the body of humanity that is Britain.
I despise Burberry(it doesn't even look nice!), Henri Lloyd, Stone Island and Hackett and the low life that wear such garments like tribal colours and Gerald Ratner's gaudy ex stock like it was the Crown Jewels.
May they rot in the a vat of sump oil drained from their Vauxhall Nova's and Astra's!
I moved from the UK seven years ago, but I return regularly, particularly to London. It never ceases to amaze me the way the fashions and morals (I appreciate I am moving towards Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells territory, sorry) move closer to the gutter.
Part of the problem seems to be they breed quicker and more frequently than most, so by 2030 the majority will be CHAV (or whatever the latest revolting incarnation happens to be).
My solution was to move to somewhere CHAVless, but it is pretty drastic and I miss some things (english beer, culture (London is second to none, and most English towns are ahead of all but a few capital cities). However, I can walk down the street in safety, strangers do not intimidate me or even shout obsenities. I don't get wound up about my tax money going to the undeserving. I also can be happy to land at Heathrow and be happier to get back on the plane a week later, which to me is a good balance
Octavius / NGB, we individually decide who is good in our opinion, and act accordingly. I agree it is dangerous to make generalisations (and in some cases illegal). However, the qualities that seem to define CHAVs mean that people with morals (as generally defined, I appreciate it is subjective) find little or nothing to relate to. Ultimately, the theory should be that no generalisations are made, but when every single piece of data points to CHAVs being beneath contempt then I can understand why people generalise.