yer average vicar gets about 30k a year. given that it is generally a 365/24/7 job (and twice on sundays......badaboom tish) i don't really think the money is the appeal.
Matthew 6:26 Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither
do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly
Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Doesn't quite seem to work like that these days.
Actually, one or two friends of mine are priests, and it's not a bad job. Free accommodation, some utilities paid for, and if they're smart they get churchwardens and lay people to help out with the work.
very few vocations become more appealing if they're unpaid. Buddhist monks still beg, but they don't have to offer sermons every week or have other pastoral duties.
I'm unsure about an occupation that seems to have things going for it, but doesn't seem to hand over enough of the reddies to make the future seem more secure. It's a job that would require a lot more faith in God providing in the future than I could muster.
When Jesus said that ‘the workers are worthy of their wages,’ he was not talking about salaries for these teachers of this good news. (Luke 10:7) He said that they would receive their necessities. To such ones he also said: “You received free, give free.” (Matthew 10:8) What will be their reward? Ah, exactly what Jesus, the greatest man who ever lived, promised—eternal life in a cleansed, paradise earth. Salaries in the millions of millions cannot equal that!
He probably can't keep up with so many with a desire to live in a place where it can clearly can not support them. To do so would spoil the need for it to remain in the background unnoticed. Like a question left for the reader, it is down to the human race to solve that one.