Naomi 24 you say
Well, I was talking about dogma initially, but since you have insisted on making this personal, no, it isn’t disparaging. It’s an accurate observation.
Your claim that you were talking about dogma before is inaccurate. You were talking about people. I am not making it personal you were. It did not say dogma, it talked about feelings and those nasty and disparaging comments about sycophancy, fear, guilt etc. It is not an accurate observation it is the world according to Naomi24. Big difference.
You believe in something for which there is no evidence simply because someone else told you it’s true. That is gullibility.
You have no idea what I believe in. Trust me. I am not gullible and I am astonished that you think you know so much about complete strangers.
The criteria for your entrance into heaven is that you worship God unconditionally – so you worship him because you think he will reward you. That is sycophancy.
This is a sweeping statement on your part. You know nothing about entrance into heaven or about my worship. You are getting way above yourself to tell people what they believe. To tell me what I believe in and call me a sycophant is not only inaccurate, it is abusive.
Cupid said, “I know that my redeemer lives” – and you agreed with her. What are you expecting him to redeem you from? Your sins perchance? Enter the guilt factor.
I ageed with Cupid. That has obviously annoyed with you that two people can agree with each other - so you have to add your nasty jibes. I can only feel sorry for you.
The only insult here is a self- inflicted one. You insult your own intelligence and your own innate ability to reason, so if you’re offended when someone else recognises what you’re actually doing don’t blame them - blame yourself. This is what you choose freely to do.
what are you talking about here Naomi? a meaningless jumble of words.
I have obviously got under your skin, and for that I make no apologies.