//v_e, 'Christian Atheist' is an ambiguous term. If you number me among the 'New Atheists' (and I'm not sure you'd be right to do that), what do you believe that you think I don't?//
That's a good question, Naomi. Both of us would agree, wouldn't we, that, having rejected the Christian myth, our moral attititudes, nonetheless, owe something to our specifically Christian culture?
An obvious example is the counter-intuitive Christian injunctions to "love thine enemies and bless those who persecute you". Nothing any pious Muslim could possibly understand. The Koranic principle of "al-Wala’ wal-Bara’" instructs Muslims to love the things Allah loves, but to hate the things and the people who reject Allah and His Messenger. A position which is not at all counter-intuitive and totally consistent with its tribalistic origins.
In summary the Christian position is hate the sin, but love the sinner, while the Muslim position is hate both.
I think that that principle might be part of why I call myself a "Christian" atheist. At the heart of the Christian message (I'm talking mainly about the message of the gospels, certainly not the conduct of "Christian" Europe) is a moral generosity irrespective of its binary theology (sheep/goats stuff). Most obviously represented in the parables and personal encounters recorded by the Evangelists.
Good Samaritan?
Prodigal Son?
"Let him who is without sin cast the first stone".
I am moved and impressed by the best parts of the New Testament.
Anybody who's read the the Book of Mormon, Dianetics or the Koran will know that those three works are devoid of moral content and all contrived by or written by fraudsters.
I may not be expressing myself very well here, Naomi. I think I'm saying that if you're brought up to believe the Christian myth you're more likely to end up being a tolerant and decent person than if you have the misfortune to be have been brought up as a Muslim.