News2 mins ago
Self Righteous Religionists, Just Gotta Love Em Eh?
323 Answers
My sons G/F is pregnant.
Her Uncle is a pastor.
He's just stated that the baby (my grandson) is a product of sin.
You just got to love these people of faith havnt you?
Dick!!
Her Uncle is a pastor.
He's just stated that the baby (my grandson) is a product of sin.
You just got to love these people of faith havnt you?
Dick!!
Answers
During an impassioned sermon about death and final judgement, the pastor said forcefully, "Each member of this church is going to die and face judgement." Glancing down at the front pew, he noticed a man with a big smile on his face - the man was called Nailit. The minister repeated his point louder. "Each member of this church is going to die and face...
21:19 Thu 11th Feb 2021
Then you are unlike Dawkins who does not recognise good or evil, insofar as the universe is completely cold and indifferent to such matters.
But you claim we are moral beings?
So for you, where does that morality come from? If you recognise evil, you must recognise good. How so if you don't believe in objective morality? And if you do, what is the moral authority on which you base your statements?
Is there a philosopher or school of thought that is congruent to yours, or at least comes close?
You appear at times to cling to the god of rationalism, yet until you can claim definitively a deterministic cosmos, your rationalism sounds a bit hollow, especially so when reason itself is a construct of consciousness, something else that is hardly understood.
Anyway, thank you for taking the time and the trouble to post.
But you claim we are moral beings?
So for you, where does that morality come from? If you recognise evil, you must recognise good. How so if you don't believe in objective morality? And if you do, what is the moral authority on which you base your statements?
Is there a philosopher or school of thought that is congruent to yours, or at least comes close?
You appear at times to cling to the god of rationalism, yet until you can claim definitively a deterministic cosmos, your rationalism sounds a bit hollow, especially so when reason itself is a construct of consciousness, something else that is hardly understood.
Anyway, thank you for taking the time and the trouble to post.
Morality arises as a consequence of having options and the need to choose amongst them based on a determination of which is the better path to follow. What is at stake is our survival and well-being. Recognising that the human mind is fallible, it is not necessarily immoral to be wrong but it is immoral not to acknowledge the responsibility inherent in our actions and the need to acquire the knowledge necessary to determine and do what is right.
Just as we are not born with the knowledge required to determine right from wrong, let alone an understanding of what those concepts mean, nor are we born with the means to make such determinations, the process of reason. Most of us have within us an inherent capacity to reason. As adults, the responsibility to develop that capacity, essential to our survival and well-being, and pass it on to others, especially our own children, falls on us.
No one can do another’s thinking for them. That is the fundamental choice we all must make for ourselves. If what I have submitted here gives you something to think about than I have in some respect achieved what I set out to do. I would never ask nor hope anyone to believe anything they cannot or do not understand for themselves.
Just as we are not born with the knowledge required to determine right from wrong, let alone an understanding of what those concepts mean, nor are we born with the means to make such determinations, the process of reason. Most of us have within us an inherent capacity to reason. As adults, the responsibility to develop that capacity, essential to our survival and well-being, and pass it on to others, especially our own children, falls on us.
No one can do another’s thinking for them. That is the fundamental choice we all must make for ourselves. If what I have submitted here gives you something to think about than I have in some respect achieved what I set out to do. I would never ask nor hope anyone to believe anything they cannot or do not understand for themselves.
Cause implies the existence of that within which it takes place and upon which it acts. Cause cannot exist in isolation from that which it effects. Cause is a property of the universe, not the cause of that apart from which it does not exist. Time itself is meaningless removed from that which it measures.
I know, Andy. I acknowledged it, because it might have distracted him from answering the actual question. Too late now x
Theland, your post in no way followed from mibs'. Let alone 'so...'. You pretty much suggested he couldn't recognise evil in front of him? That's harsh, and not something that has come across from his posts.
Theland, your post in no way followed from mibs'. Let alone 'so...'. You pretty much suggested he couldn't recognise evil in front of him? That's harsh, and not something that has come across from his posts.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.