Crosswords1 min ago
Genesis 6
95 Answers
I can’t find the thread I saw fleetingly earlier where Theland said that Genesis 6 confuses him but that a Christian apologist(?) had explained the content. I assume Theland means the first part of the chapter which is, indeed, curious, so here you are Theland, a special thread.
// And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.//
What was his explanation?
Over to you - and to anyone else who would like to have a little ponder on it.
// And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.//
What was his explanation?
Over to you - and to anyone else who would like to have a little ponder on it.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Oh drat!
Like an itch that has to be scratched I just have to commit once again.
But to draw attention to my favourite atheist intellectual, Peter Atkins.
Entertaining video of him debating with one of my favourite Christian scientists, Hugh Ross.
Peter is a true gentleman, and sticks to his guns, but is never rude, although he can be a bit silly, in my opinion.
Not a question from me other than inviting comment.
Like an itch that has to be scratched I just have to commit once again.
But to draw attention to my favourite atheist intellectual, Peter Atkins.
Entertaining video of him debating with one of my favourite Christian scientists, Hugh Ross.
Peter is a true gentleman, and sticks to his guns, but is never rude, although he can be a bit silly, in my opinion.
Not a question from me other than inviting comment.
